Sharma Gulshan, Kuo Yong-Fang, Freeman Jean, Zhang Dong D, Goodwin James S
Department of Internal Medicine, 301 University Blvd., University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0561, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 22;170(4):363-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.553.
Comanagement of surgical patients by medicine physicians (generalist physicians or internal medicine subspecialists) has been shown to improve efficiency and to reduce adverse outcomes. We examined the extent to which comanagement is used during hospitalizations for common surgical procedures in the United States.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized for 1 of 15 inpatient surgical procedures from 1996 to 2006 (n = 694 806). We also calculated the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries comanaged by medicine physicians (generalist physicians or internal medicine subspecialists) during hospitalization. Comanagement was defined by relevant physicians (generalist or internal medicine subspecialist) submitting a claim for evaluation and management services on 70% or more of the days that the patients were hospitalized.
Between 1996 and 2006, 35.2% of patients hospitalized for a common surgical procedure were comanaged by a medicine physician: 23.7% by a generalist physician and 14% by an internal medicine subspecialist (2.5% were comanaged by both). The percentage of patients experiencing comanagement was relatively unchanged from 1996 to 2000 and then increased sharply. The increase was entirely attributable to a surge in comanagement by generalist physicians. In a multivariable multilevel analysis, comanagement by generalist physicians increased 11.4% per year from 2001 to 2006. Patients with advanced age, with more comorbidities, or receiving care in nonteaching, midsize (200-499 beds), or for-profit hospitals were more likely to receive comanagement. All of the growth in comanagement was attributed to increased comanagement by hospitalist physicians.
Medical comanagement of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for a surgical procedure is increasing because of the increasing role of hospitalists. To meet this growing need for comanagement, training in internal medicine should include medical management of surgical patients.
医学医师(全科医师或内科专科医师)对手术患者进行共同管理已被证明可提高效率并减少不良后果。我们研究了在美国常见外科手术住院期间共同管理的使用程度。
我们对1996年至2006年因15种住院手术之一住院的医疗保险按服务收费受益人进行了一项回顾性队列研究(n = 694806)。我们还计算了住院期间由医学医师(全科医师或内科专科医师)共同管理的医疗保险受益人的比例。共同管理的定义是相关医师(全科医师或内科专科医师)在患者住院70%或更多天数提交评估和管理服务申请。
1996年至2006年期间,因常见外科手术住院的患者中有35.2%由医学医师共同管理:23.7%由全科医师管理,14%由内科专科医师管理(2.5%由两者共同管理)。1996年至2000年期间共同管理的患者百分比相对不变,然后急剧增加。这种增加完全归因于全科医师共同管理的激增。在多变量多层次分析中,2001年至2006年期间全科医师的共同管理每年增加11.4%。年龄较大、合并症较多或在非教学、中型(200 - 499张床位)或营利性医院接受治疗的患者更有可能接受共同管理。共同管理的所有增长都归因于住院医师共同管理的增加。
由于住院医师的作用不断增加,因外科手术住院的医疗保险受益人的医疗共同管理正在增加。为满足对共同管理日益增长的需求,内科培训应包括手术患者的医疗管理。