文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

从英国角度看普瑞巴林治疗纤维肌痛症的成本效益。

Cost effectiveness of pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia from a UK perspective.

机构信息

King's Musculoskeletal Clinical Trials Unit, Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):965-75. doi: 10.1185/03007991003600271.


DOI:10.1185/03007991003600271
PMID:20178405
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition associated with widespread pain, sleep disturbance and disability. Disease related costs are high and effective treatment options few. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed comparing pregabalin 300 mg or 450 mg against placebo, duloxetine 60 mg or 120 mg, gabapentin, tramadol and amitriptyline. After a 12 week treatment phase patients who responded to treatment entered an ongoing treatment phase using a Markov model in which patients maintained response, lost response or dropped out. The base case considered patients with severe fibromyalgia defined as a Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire score of >or=59 and a pain score of >or=6.5 at baseline. Response rates for pregabalin and placebo were taken from three randomised trials, and a 1 year open-label extension study was used for long-term parameters. Response was defined as a >or=30% improvement over baseline in pain score and a patient global impression of change rating of much improved or very much improved. Relative rates of response for other comparators over placebo were extracted from a systematic review of published randomised controlled studies. The primary effectiveness endpoint was Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Utilities gained over baseline were estimated by applying the SF-6D utility algorithm to SF-36 data collected in the pregabalin trials. Resource use associated with fibromyalgia management was estimated from published studies and costs were estimated from the UK NHS perspective at 2008 prices. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5%. Non-parametric bootstrapping analysis was used to generate confidence intervals. RESULTS: In the base case, pregabalin 300 mg and 450 mg increased cost per patient by pound601 (95% CI: 532, 669) and pound653 (587, 727) and improved QALYs per patient by 0.03 (-0.03, 0.06) and 0.03 (-0.04, 0.08) respectively compared to placebo. The cost per QALY gained (CQG) was pound23,166 and pound22,533. In the base case population CQG for pregabalin 450 mg against duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg was pound19,224 and pound14,096, against gabapentin pound35,737, against tramadol pound98,072, and was dominated by amitriptyline. Sensitivity analysis found the cost effectiveness of pregabalin to be most sensitive to drug price and response rates. Limitations of the analysis include different definitions of response used and lack of subgroup data reported in the published studies synthesised, and limited data on long-term effect of therapies in fibromyalgia. Although the analysis was based on the best available evidence, the comparisons against amitriptyline and tramadol rely on old studies that were not designed to meet current quality criteria. CONCLUSION: This model found pregabalin 300 mg and 450 mg to be cost effective compared with placebo and, within the limits of available evidence, against duloxetine using standard UK criteria in patients with fibromyalgia experiencing severe pain.

摘要

背景:纤维肌痛是一种与广泛疼痛、睡眠障碍和残疾相关的慢性疾病。与该疾病相关的成本很高,但有效的治疗选择却很少。

目的:评估普瑞巴林治疗纤维肌痛的成本效果。

方法:开发了一个决策分析模型,比较了普瑞巴林 300mg 或 450mg 与安慰剂、度洛西汀 60mg 或 120mg、加巴喷丁、曲马多和阿米替林的成本效果。在 12 周的治疗阶段后,对治疗有反应的患者进入一个使用 Markov 模型的持续治疗阶段,在该模型中,患者保持反应、失去反应或退出。基础情况考虑了严重纤维肌痛的患者,定义为基线时纤维肌痛影响问卷评分>或=59 和疼痛评分>或=6.5。普瑞巴林和安慰剂的反应率来自三项随机试验,一项为期 1 年的开放标签扩展研究用于长期参数。反应定义为疼痛评分相对于基线改善>或=30%,患者整体印象变化评分“明显改善”或“非常明显改善”。其他比较剂相对于安慰剂的相对反应率从已发表的随机对照研究的系统评价中提取。主要有效性终点是质量调整生命年(QALYs)。通过将 SF-36 数据应用于 SF-6D 效用算法来估计基线后获得的效用。从已发表的研究中估算与纤维肌痛管理相关的资源利用情况,并从英国国民保健系统的角度估算 2008 年的成本。成本和 QALYs 贴现率为 3.5%。使用非参数自举分析生成置信区间。

结果:在基础情况下,普瑞巴林 300mg 和 450mg 使每位患者的成本分别增加了 601 英镑(95%CI:532,669)和 653 英镑(587,727),并使每位患者的 QALY 分别增加了 0.03(-0.03,0.06)和 0.03(-0.04,0.08)。与安慰剂相比,每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本(CQG)分别为 23166 英镑和 22533 英镑。在基础情况下人群中,普瑞巴林 450mg 相对于度洛西汀 60mg 和 120mg 的 CQG 为 19224 英镑和 14096 英镑,相对于加巴喷丁为 35737 英镑,相对于曲马多为 98072 英镑,并且优于阿米替林。敏感性分析发现,普瑞巴林的成本效果对药物价格和反应率最为敏感。分析的局限性包括使用不同的反应定义,以及综合的已发表研究中缺乏报告的亚组数据,以及纤维肌痛中长期治疗效果的数据有限。尽管该分析基于最佳现有证据,但与阿米替林和曲马多的比较依赖于旧的研究,这些研究不是为了满足当前的质量标准而设计的。

结论:该模型发现,在严重疼痛的纤维肌痛患者中,与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林 300mg 和 450mg 具有成本效果,并且在可用证据的限制内,与度洛西汀相比,使用英国标准也具有成本效果。

相似文献

[1]
Cost effectiveness of pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia from a UK perspective.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010-4

[2]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacologic treatment of fibromyalgia in Mexico.

Reumatol Clin. 2012

[3]
The cost-effectiveness of pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia: US perspective.

J Med Econ. 2012-2-17

[4]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with gabapentin and pregabalin for treating postherpetic neuralgia: a german perspective.

Clin Drug Investig. 2008

[5]
A cost-utility comparison of four first-line medications in painful diabetic neuropathy.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2008

[6]
Career lifetime advances and key developments: diabetes.

Clin Med (Lond). 2007-6

[7]
Cost-effectiveness of duloxetine in chronic low back pain: a Quebec societal perspective.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-5-15

[8]
Long-term cost-effectiveness of initiating treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy with pregabalin, duloxetine, gabapentin, or desipramine.

Pain. 2016-1

[9]
Cost effectiveness of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in the UK: a Markov model analysis.

Clin Drug Investig. 2010

[10]
A cost-utility analysis of pregabalin versus duloxetine for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Cost-Utility of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Fibromyalgia versus a Multicomponent Intervention and Usual Care: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial (EUDAIMON Study).

J Clin Med. 2019-7-20

[2]
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review.

PLoS One. 2018-10-15

[3]
Clinical utility, safety, and efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2016-2-17

[4]
Resource utilisation and direct costs in patients with recently diagnosed fibromyalgia who are offered one of three different interventions in a randomised pragmatic trial.

Clin Rheumatol. 2016-5

[5]
Cost-utility of cognitive behavioral therapy versus U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended drugs and usual care in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: an economic evaluation alongside a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

Arthritis Res Ther. 2014-10-1

[6]
Fibromyalgia: disease synopsis, medication cost effectiveness and economic burden.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014-5

[7]
A systematic cost-effectiveness analysis of pregabalin in the management of fibromyalgia: an Iranian experience.

Arch Med Sci. 2013-12-26

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索