• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错误部位疼痛管理程序发生率及根本原因分析:一项多中心研究。

Incidence and root cause analysis of wrong-site pain management procedures: a multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Blaustein Pain Treatment Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):711-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf892d.

DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf892d
PMID:20179510
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical errors exact an inordinate toll on healthcare costs. One of the most publicized and analyzed type of medical error is wrong-site surgery. Yet, despite the burgeoning number of procedures performed, no literature exists on wrong-site pain management injections. The purpose of this study was to estimate the relative incidence and determine the causes of wrong-site pain management procedures.

METHODS

Quality improvement records were examined during a 2-yr period from four civilian academic teaching hospitals, three military treatment facilities, and three private practices, for "sentinel" events involving wrong-site pain management procedures. A total of 13 cases (incidence 0.027%; 95% CI 0.01-0.05%) were identified from approximately 48,941 collective procedures of which 52.4% were deemed to be "at risk" for the occurrence. Root cause analyses were then conducted to determine the origin of each error.

RESULTS

The 13 cases included five wrong-side transforaminal epidural steroid injections, six other wrong-side injections, and two wrong-level minimally invasive surgical procedures. In only one case was the "universal protocol" completely followed, and in nine procedures, multiple lapses occurred in protocol. Three patients had bilateral pathology, and in seven cases, the patient knew at the time that the wrong side was being injected. In no instance did any technical, legal, or professional consequences ensue from the error.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrong-site nerve blocks occur more frequently in pain management centers than has previously been acknowledged. Adaptation of the universal protocol to nerve blocks and strict adherence to widely accepted guidelines may prevent wrong-site interventional pain procedures.

摘要

背景

医疗差错给医疗成本造成了巨大的损失。最受关注和分析的医疗差错之一是手术部位错误。然而,尽管手术数量不断增加,但目前还没有关于错误部位疼痛管理注射的文献。本研究的目的是估计错误部位疼痛管理程序的相对发生率,并确定其原因。

方法

在四年间,从四家民营学术教学医院、三家军队医疗机构和三家私人诊所的质量改进记录中,对涉及错误部位疼痛管理程序的“哨兵”事件进行了检查。在大约 48941 例集体手术中,共发现了 13 例(发生率为 0.027%;95%CI0.01-0.05%),其中 52.4%被认为存在发生错误的风险。然后进行根本原因分析,以确定每个错误的来源。

结果

这 13 例包括 5 例错误侧经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射、6 例其他错误侧注射和 2 例错误水平微创手术。只有 1 例完全遵循了“通用协议”,9 例程序中协议多次出现失误。有 3 例患者有双侧病变,在 7 例病例中,患者在当时就知道注射的是错误的一侧。在任何情况下,错误都没有导致任何技术、法律或专业后果。

结论

错误部位神经阻滞在疼痛管理中心比以前承认的更为常见。通用协议的适应和严格遵守广泛接受的指南可能会防止错误部位介入性疼痛程序。

相似文献

1
Incidence and root cause analysis of wrong-site pain management procedures: a multicenter study.错误部位疼痛管理程序发生率及根本原因分析:一项多中心研究。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):711-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf892d.
2
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.手术室内外不正确的外科手术程序。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1028-34. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.126.
3
[Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain--is the quality decisive?].[神经阻滞在治疗和诊断腰背痛中的相关性——质量起决定性作用吗?]
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):474-83. doi: 10.1007/s004820100035.
4
Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable?手术部位错误、手术操作错误和患者错误相关不良事件:它们是否可预防?
Arch Surg. 2006 Sep;141(9):931-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.9.931.
5
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
6
Quality assurance for interventional pain management procedures in private practice.
Pain Physician. 2008 Jan;11(1):43-55.
7
Wrong-site sinus surgery in otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科的鼻窦手术误切部位
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jul;143(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.04.003.
8
Quality assurance for interventional pain management procedures.介入性疼痛管理程序的质量保证。
Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):107-14.
9
Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.手术部位错误的发生率、模式及预防
Arch Surg. 2006 Apr;141(4):353-7; discussion 357-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.4.353.
10
[Wrong-site surgery: incidence and prevention].[手术部位错误:发生率及预防]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Nov 27;168(48):4205-9.

引用本文的文献

1
From error to prevention of wrong-level spine surgery: a review.从脊柱手术错误到错误节段手术的预防:综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 May 15;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00440-4.
2
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.确定一组医疗保健“永不发生”事件,以推动系统变革:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264.
3
Establishing a common language for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections.建立腰椎椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的通用语言。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;7(4):467-474. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-71.
4
Applying fault tree analysis to the prevention of wrong-site surgery.应用故障树分析预防手术部位错误
J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.062. Epub 2014 Sep 6.