Department of Pediatrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Apr;50(4):385-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181bb3457.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of oral beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission in children with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis (UC).
Thirty patients with active UC (pancolitis or left-sided colitis) were enrolled in an open-labeled, randomized, head-to-head study. Group 1 (n = 15) received oral BDP (5 mg/day) for 8 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy with oral mesalazine, 5-aminosalycilate (5-ASA); group 2 (n = 15) received oral 5-ASA (80 mg . kg . day). Assessments were carried out (at 4, 8, and 12 weeks) for clinical scores and for endoscopy (at 12 weeks), together with a final clinical assessment after 1 year follow-up.
Patients treated with BDP showed a significant reduced clinical activity within 4 weeks (P < 0.001 vs pretreatment values) with 80% achieving clinical remission compared with 33% treated with only 5-ASA (P < 0.025). A significant reduction in clinical activity was achieved by 5-ASA after 8 weeks. Comparing clinical activity between BDP and 5-ASA, the former did significantly better at 8 (P < 0.003) and at 12 weeks (P < 0.015). In 73% of BDP-treated patients colonoscopy showed remission compared with 27% of 5-ASA (P < 0.025). Both treatments led to better scores compared with pretreatment values (P < 0.001, both). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly reduced (P < 0.025 or less) with both treatments, whereas C-reactive protein dropped significantly (P < 0.02) only in BDP.
Oral BDP was well tolerated and acts significantly faster and more effectively than 5-ASA in inducing clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in pediatric mild-to-moderate UC.
本研究旨在评估口服倍氯米松双丙酸酯(BDP)在诱导儿童轻中度活动期溃疡性结肠炎(UC)临床和内镜缓解方面的临床疗效。
30 例活动期 UC(全结肠炎或左半结肠炎)患者入组一项开放标签、随机、头对头研究。第 1 组(n = 15)接受口服 BDP(5 mg/天)治疗 8 周,然后接受口服美沙拉嗪、5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)维持治疗;第 2 组(n = 15)接受口服 5-ASA(80 mg/kg/天)治疗。在第 4、8 和 12 周进行临床评分评估和内镜检查(在第 12 周),并在 1 年随访后进行最终临床评估。
BDP 治疗组患者在 4 周内临床活动显著减轻(P < 0.001 与治疗前相比),80%达到临床缓解,而仅接受 5-ASA 治疗的患者中仅 33%达到缓解(P < 0.025)。5-ASA 在 8 周时也能显著减轻临床活动。比较 BDP 和 5-ASA 的临床疗效,前者在第 8 周(P < 0.003)和第 12 周(P < 0.015)时表现明显更好。BDP 治疗组 73%的患者结肠镜下缓解,而 5-ASA 治疗组仅 27%的患者缓解(P < 0.025)。两种治疗方法均使与治疗前相比评分更好(P < 0.001,均)。红细胞沉降率均显著降低(P < 0.025 或更低),而 C 反应蛋白仅在 BDP 治疗组显著降低(P < 0.02)。
口服 BDP 耐受性良好,在诱导儿童轻中度活动期 UC 的临床缓解和内镜改善方面,起效更快,效果明显优于 5-ASA。