Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Account Res. 2009 May;16(3):127-52. doi: 10.1080/08989620902984080.
For academic research outcomes, an important bibliometric scoring termed as the journal impact factor (JIF) is used when assessment of the quality of research is required. No known study has been conducted to explore the bibliographical trends of 'Medicine, General & Internal' journals indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports. Data from the Journal Citation Reports and Web of Science database were extracted to formulate a comprehensive analysis. In this study, the trends of 15 journals (5 top ranked and 10 low ranked; 5 English and 5 non-English based) were selected and analysed over a 9-year period (starting from year 1999 to 2007). Using the year 1999 as the base year, the results showed that the JIF rose significantly for the selected top ranked journals (up to 180.9%) while the low ranked ones slipped in their JIF value (down to -44.4%). The observed upward or downward trend was caused by a combination of other bibliographical measures like citations, number of citable, and total items published. It is postulated that changes in bibliographical trends can be classified as editorial and non-editorial influences. The impacts of these influences on the 15 selected journals over the 9-year period were also discussed retrospectively.
对于学术研究成果,当需要评估研究质量时,使用一种重要的计量评分,即期刊影响因子(JIF)。目前还没有已知的研究探讨过被年度期刊引证报告(JCR)索引的“医学,内科”期刊的文献计量学趋势。从期刊引证报告和 Web of Science 数据库中提取数据,进行综合分析。在这项研究中,选择了 15 种期刊(5 种顶级期刊和 10 种低排名期刊;5 种英文期刊和 5 种非英文期刊),在 9 年期间(从 1999 年到 2007 年)进行了分析。以 1999 年为基年,结果表明,所选顶级期刊的 JIF 显著上升(最高达 180.9%),而低排名期刊的 JIF 值则下降(最低至-44.4%)。观察到的上升或下降趋势是由引文、可引用数量和发表的总项目等其他文献计量指标的组合造成的。可以假设文献计量学趋势的变化可以分为编辑和非编辑影响。还回顾性地讨论了这些影响对这 15 种选定期刊在 9 年期间的影响。