Richardson Barbara, Lindquist Ingrid
School of Allied Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Physiother Res Int. 2010 Jun;15(2):111-7. doi: 10.1002/pri.463.
The current emphasis on evidence based physiotherapy focuses on building knowledge through systematic review of quantitative inquiry studies. Knowledge that provides a framework for practice can help practitioners to decide when and how to use this evidence in their practice contexts.
This paper argues for increased attention to metasynthesis of qualitative inquiry research studies to help identify an underpinning professional knowledge base of physiotherapy that is relevant to day to day practice and education, and to emphasize an epistemological dimension of physiotherapy practice as a socially embedded professional activity.
An outline of knowledge development in physiotherapy is followed by an explanation and description of the process of metasynthesis and an evaluation of the value of metasynthesis to physiotherapy practice and education.
Integration of substantive knowledge from metasynthesis of individual qualitative inquiry studies, can generate middle range theory to give a degree of abstraction which can provoke broader questions and insights to re-conceptualize issues of practice.
The methodological approach of metasynthesis can lead to broader and deeper conceptualization of the quality of professional activities which are fundamental to integrating research evidence in successful physiotherapy service delivery.
当前对循证物理治疗的重视集中于通过对定量研究的系统评价来积累知识。能为实践提供框架的知识有助于从业者决定在其实际工作环境中何时以及如何运用这些证据。
本文主张更多地关注定性研究的元综合,以帮助确定与日常实践和教育相关的物理治疗专业知识基础,并强调物理治疗实践作为一种社会嵌入性专业活动的认识论维度。
在概述物理治疗知识发展之后,对元综合过程进行解释和描述,并评估元综合对物理治疗实践和教育的价值。
整合来自个体定性研究元综合的实质性知识,可以生成中程理论,提供一定程度的抽象,从而引发更广泛的问题和见解,以重新概念化实践问题。
元综合的方法论途径能够导致对专业活动质量更广泛、更深入的概念化,而这对于在成功的物理治疗服务提供中整合研究证据至关重要。