Department of Pharmacology, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, GBSF 3506, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2010 Sep;103(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
Inactivation of L-type Ca channels (LTCC) is regulated by both Ca and voltage-dependent processes (CDI and VDI). To differentiate VDI and CDI, several experimental and theoretical studies have considered the inactivation of Ba current through LTCC (I(Ba)) as a measure of VDI. However, there is evidence that Ba can weakly mimic Ca, such that I(Ba) inactivation is still a mixture of CDI and VDI. To avoid this complication, some have used the monovalent cation current through LTCC (I(NS)), which can be measured when divalent cation concentrations are very low. Notably, I(NS) inactivation rate does not depend on current amplitude, and hence may reflect purely VDI. However, based on analysis of existent and new data, and modeling, we find that I(NS) can inactivate more rapidly and completely than I(Ba), especially at physiological temperature. Thus VDI that occurs during I(Ba) (or I(Ca)) must differ intrinsically from VDI during I(NS). To account for this, we have extended a previously published LTCC mathematical model of VDI and CDI into an excitation-contraction coupling model, and assessed whether and how experimental I(Ba) inactivation results (traditionally used in VDI experiments and models) could be recapitulated by modifying CDI to account for Ba-dependent inactivation. Thus, the view of a slow and incomplete I(NS) inactivation should be revised, and I(NS) inactivation is a poor measure of VDI during I(Ca) or I(Ba). This complicates VDI analysis experimentally, but raises intriguing new questions about how the molecular mechanisms of VDI differ for divalent and monovalent currents through LTCCs.
L 型钙通道 (LTCC) 的失活受 Ca 和电压依赖性过程 (CDI 和 VDI) 的调节。为了区分 VDI 和 CDI,一些实验和理论研究将 LTCC 中的钡电流失活 (I(Ba)) 视为 VDI 的衡量标准。然而,有证据表明钡可以微弱地模拟 Ca,因此 I(Ba)失活仍然是 CDI 和 VDI 的混合物。为了避免这种复杂性,一些人使用 LTCC 的单价阳离子电流 (I(NS)),当二价阳离子浓度非常低时可以测量到该电流。值得注意的是,I(NS)失活速率不依赖于电流幅度,因此可能反映纯粹的 VDI。然而,根据现有和新数据的分析以及建模,我们发现 I(NS)的失活速度比 I(Ba)更快、更完全,尤其是在生理温度下。因此,I(Ba)(或 I(Ca)) 期间发生的 VDI 必须与 I(NS)期间的 VDI 在本质上有所不同。为了解决这个问题,我们已经将先前发表的 LTCC VDI 和 CDI 数学模型扩展到兴奋-收缩偶联模型中,并评估了通过修改 CDI 来解释钡依赖性失活,是否以及如何重现传统上用于 VDI 实验和模型的实验 I(Ba)失活结果。因此,应该修正对 I(NS)失活缓慢且不完全的观点,并且 I(NS)失活不能很好地衡量 I(Ca)或 I(Ba)期间的 VDI。这在实验上使 VDI 分析变得复杂,但引发了关于 LTCC 中两种价和单价电流的 VDI 分子机制如何不同的新问题。