Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ultrasonics. 2010 Jun;50(7):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Feb 14.
The goal of this work was to test experimentally that exposing air bubbles or ultrasound contrast agents in water to amplitude modulated wave allows control of inertial cavitation affected volume and hence could limit the undesirable bioeffects.
Focused transducer operating at the center frequency of 10 MHz and having about 65% fractional bandwidth was excited by 3 micros 8.5 and 11.5 MHz tone-bursts to produce 3 MHz envelope signal. The 3 MHz frequency was selected because it corresponds to the resonance frequency of the microbubbles used in the experiment. Another 5 MHz transducer was used as a receiver to produce B-mode image. Peak negative acoustic pressure was adjusted in the range from 0.5 to 3.5 MPa. The spectrum amplitudes obtained from the imaging of SonoVue contrast agent when using the envelope and a separate 3 MHz transducer were compared to determine their cross-section at the -6 dB level.
The conventional 3 MHz tone-burst excitation resulted in the region of interest (ROI) cross-section of 2.47 mm while amplitude modulated, dual-frequency excitation with difference frequency of 3 MHz produced cross-section equal to 1.2mm.
These results corroborate our hypothesis that, in addition to the considerably higher penetration depth of dual-frequency excitation due to the lower attenuation at 3 MHz than that at 8.5 and 11.5 MHz, the sample volume of dual-frequency excitation is also smaller than that of linear 3-MHz method for more spatially confined destruction of microbubbles.
本工作的目的是通过实验验证,将水中的气泡或超声对比剂暴露于调幅波下,可以控制惯性空化的影响体积,从而限制其不良的生物效应。
使用中心频率为 10MHz、带宽约为 65%的聚焦换能器,通过 3 微秒的 8.5MHz 和 11.5MHz 脉冲激励产生 3MHz 包络信号。选择 3MHz 频率是因为它对应于实验中使用的微泡的共振频率。另一个 5MHz 的换能器用作接收器以产生 B 模式图像。峰负声压在 0.5 至 3.5MPa 的范围内进行调节。使用包络和单独的 3MHz 换能器对 SonoVue 对比剂进行成像获得的频谱幅度进行比较,以确定其在-6dB 水平的截面。
常规的 3MHz 脉冲激励产生的感兴趣区域(ROI)截面为 2.47mm,而采用差频为 3MHz 的调幅、双频激励产生的截面等于 1.2mm。
这些结果证实了我们的假设,即除了双频激励由于 3MHz 的衰减比 8.5MHz 和 11.5MHz 低而具有更高的穿透深度之外,双频激励的样品体积也小于线性 3MHz 方法,因为双频激励更能在空间上限制微泡的破坏。