Suppr超能文献

临床医生对床头抬高的看法。

Clinicians' perception of head-of-bed elevation.

机构信息

Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98125, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2010 Mar;19(2):164-7. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010917.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Head-of-bed elevation of 30 degrees to 45 degrees is important in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia, but clinicians' perception and determination of head-of-bed elevation are not widely reported.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) document the accuracy of clinicians' perception of head-of-bed elevation, (2) document methods clinicians use to determine the head-of-bed angle, and (3) assess knowledge of recommended head-of-bed elevation.

METHODS

Clinicians (n = 175) viewed a simulated patient with head of bed elevated 30 degrees and elevation gauge concealed. They answered 3 questions: What is the level of the head of the bed? What head-of-bed elevation is associated with decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia? When providing care, how do you routinely determine the head-of-bed elevation?

RESULTS

Fifty percent of 89 registered nurses and 53% of 39 physicians identified head-of-bed elevation correctly (+/-5 degrees ). Head-of-bed elevation was perceived accurately by 86% of 21 respiratory therapists, 63% of 16 medical assistants, and 50% of 10 physical/occupational therapists. Ninety-five percent of nurses and respiratory therapists, 79% of physicians, 90% of physical/occupational therapists, and 46% of medical assistants correctly identified the head-of-bed angle associated with decreases in occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Techniques for determining the angle varied; 58% of respondents reported using the gauge.

CONCLUSIONS

Head-of-bed angle was perceived correctly by 50% to 86% of clinicians. Nurses tended to underestimate the angle, whereas other clinicians tended to overestimate. Nurses, respiratory therapists, and physical/occupational therapists showed the best understanding of the correct angle for minimizing occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Elevation gauges were most often used to determine the angle.

摘要

背景

床头抬高 30 度至 45 度对预防呼吸机相关性肺炎很重要,但临床医生对床头抬高的感知和确定并不广泛报告。

目的

(1)记录临床医生对床头抬高的感知准确性,(2)记录临床医生确定床头角度的方法,(3)评估对推荐床头抬高的了解程度。

方法

临床医生(n=175)观察了一位床头抬高 30 度且抬高量规被隐藏的模拟患者。他们回答了 3 个问题:床头的水平高度是多少?与降低呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率相关的床头抬高角度是多少?在提供护理时,您通常如何确定床头抬高角度?

结果

89 名注册护士中有 50%和 39 名医生中有 53%正确识别了床头抬高(+/-5 度)。21 名呼吸治疗师中有 86%、16 名医疗助理中有 63%、10 名物理/职业治疗师中有 50%准确地感知了床头抬高。95%的护士和呼吸治疗师、79%的医生、90%的物理/职业治疗师和 46%的医疗助理正确识别了降低呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率的床头角度。确定角度的技术各不相同;58%的受访者报告使用量规。

结论

50%至 86%的临床医生正确感知了床头角度。护士往往低估了角度,而其他临床医生则往往高估了角度。护士、呼吸治疗师和物理/职业治疗师对最小化呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率的正确角度表现出最好的理解。最常使用量规来确定角度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验