Suppr超能文献

何时以及为何要进行交叉配血?对英格兰北部两个地区的输血实验室实践的前瞻性调查。

When and why is blood crossmatched? A prospective survey of transfusion laboratory practice in two regions in the north of England.

机构信息

NHS Blood and Transplant, National Blood Service, Holland Drive, Newcastle, UK.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2010 Aug 1;99(2):163-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01317.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to provide data relating to the timing of laboratory crossmatch procedures, and the source of requests for out of hours crossmatch, to support interpretation of error reports originating in the transfusion laboratory, received by the Serious Hazards of Transfusion haemovigilance scheme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on the timing, origin and urgency of all crossmatch requests were collected in 34 hospitals in northern England over a 7-day period in 2008. Additional data on clinical urgency were collected on crossmatches that were performed out of hours.

RESULTS

Data were obtained on 2423 crossmatches, including 610 (25.2%) performed outside core hours. 30.3% of out of hours crossmatch requests were for transfusions that were set up outside 4 h of completion of the crossmatch.

CONCLUSION

2008 Serious Hazards of Transfusion data showed that 29/39 (74%) of laboratory errors resulting in 'wrong blood' occurred out of hours whilst our audit shows that only 25% of crossmatch requests are made in that time period, suggesting that crossmatching performed outside core hours carries increased risks. The reason for increased risk of error needs further research, but 25 laboratories had only one member of staff working out of hours, often combining blood transfusion, haematology and coagulation work. A total of 25% of out of hours requests were not clinically urgent. Hospitals should develop policies to define indications for out of hours transfusion testing, empower laboratory staff to challenge inappropriate requests and ensure that staffing and expertise is appropriate for the workload at all times.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在提供与实验室配血程序时间安排以及非工作时间配血请求来源相关的数据,以支持对源于输血实验室的错误报告进行解读,这些错误报告通过严重输血危害监测计划被接收。

材料与方法

在 2008 年的一周内,英格兰北部的 34 家医院收集了所有配血请求的时间、来源和紧急程度的数据。对非工作时间进行的配血,还收集了关于临床紧急程度的数据。

结果

共获得了 2423 次配血数据,其中 610 次(25.2%)在核心时间之外进行。30.3%的非工作时间配血请求是为了在配血完成后 4 小时内完成的输血。

结论

2008 年严重输血危害的数据显示,导致“错误用血”的实验室错误中有 29/39(74%)发生在非工作时间,而我们的审核显示,只有 25%的配血请求是在该时间段内提出的,这表明非核心时间的配血操作存在更高的风险。错误风险增加的原因需要进一步研究,但有 25 个实验室只有一名工作人员在非工作时间工作,通常同时进行输血、血液学和凝血工作。非工作时间请求中,有 25%的并不紧急。医院应制定政策,明确非工作时间输血检测的指征,授权实验室工作人员对不适当的请求提出质疑,并确保人员配备和专业知识始终适应工作量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验