Suppr超能文献

计划生育方面的差异。

Disparities in family planning.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022.

Abstract

Prominent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and unintended births exist in the United States. These disparities can contribute to the cycle of disadvantage experienced by specific demographic groups when women are unable to control their fertility as desired. In this review we consider 3 factors that contribute to disparities in family planning outcomes: patient preferences and behaviors, health care system factors, and provider-related factors. Through addressing barriers to access to family planning services, including abortion and contraception, and working to ensure that all women receive patient-centered reproductive health care, health care providers and policy makers can substantially improve the ability of women from all racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds to make informed decisions about their fertility.

摘要

在美国,妊娠、堕胎和非意愿妊娠的发生率存在显著的种族/民族和社会经济差异。这些差异可能导致特定人群在无法按照自己的意愿控制生育能力时,陷入劣势循环。在这篇综述中,我们考虑了导致计划生育结果差异的 3 个因素:患者偏好和行为、医疗保健系统因素以及与提供者相关的因素。通过解决计划生育服务(包括堕胎和避孕)的可及性障碍,并努力确保所有妇女都能获得以患者为中心的生殖保健,医疗保健提供者和政策制定者可以大大提高所有种族/民族和社会经济背景的妇女做出有关其生育能力的知情决策的能力。

相似文献

1
Disparities in family planning.计划生育方面的差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022.
9
Principles of contraceptive care: choice, acceptability and access.避孕护理原则:选择、可接受性和可及性。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;23(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Systematic review of public health branding.公共卫生品牌的系统评价。
J Health Commun. 2008 Dec;13(8):721-41. doi: 10.1080/10810730802487364.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验