Suppr超能文献

杆卡式种植覆盖义齿修复后边缘骨吸收和义齿维护的前瞻性研究。

Marginal bone loss and prosthetic maintenance of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures: a prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):137-45.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare marginal bone loss, soft tissue conditions, and prosthetic outcomes of implants supporting mandibular and maxillary bar-retained overdentures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 124 implants (80 in the mandible and 44 in the maxilla) were placed in 35 patients. Bar-retained overdentures were fabricated for each patient. Prosthetic complications were recorded throughout the study. Plaque, peri-implant inflammation, bleeding, and calculus indices were recorded, and standard periapical radiographs were obtained at each implant site for measurement of marginal bone loss.

RESULTS

One implant failed in the mandible prior to prosthesis fabrication and one failed in the maxilla 5 years after prosthesis delivery. Both were replaced after 12 weeks of bone healing. The mean marginal bone loss around maxillary implants was greater than that around mandibular implants. Comparative evaluations of subgroups followed for < 5 years and greater than or equal to 5 years showed that soft tissue parameters were similar for maxillary and mandibular implants. One- and 5-year survival probabilities of the mandibular and maxillary overdentures were comparable. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests revealed that the probabilities of retightening of retainer and requirements for occlusal adjustments were higher for mandibular overdentures, whereas other maintenance requirements were comparable. The retainers in mandibular overdentures needed retightening more frequently than the retainers in maxillary overdentures.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental implants supporting mandibular and maxillary bar-retained overdentures have similar peri-implant soft tissue outcomes and overall prosthetic survival probabilities.

摘要

目的

比较下颌和上颌杆固位覆盖义齿种植体的边缘骨丢失、软组织状况和修复体效果。

材料和方法

共纳入 35 名患者的 124 枚种植体(下颌 80 枚,上颌 44 枚)。为每位患者制作了杆固位覆盖义齿。在整个研究过程中记录了修复体并发症。记录菌斑、种植体周围炎症、出血和牙石指数,并在每个种植体部位获取标准根尖片以测量边缘骨丢失。

结果

在制作义齿之前,有 1 枚下颌种植体在义齿制作前失败,有 1 枚上颌种植体在义齿使用 5 年后失败。两者均在骨愈合 12 周后更换。上颌种植体周围的平均边缘骨丢失大于下颌种植体周围的平均边缘骨丢失。对随访时间<5 年和≥5 年的亚组进行比较评估,发现上颌和下颌种植体的软组织参数相似。下颌和上颌覆盖义齿的 1 年和 5 年生存率相当。Kaplan-Meier 和对数秩检验显示,下颌覆盖义齿的固位体拧紧和咬合调整要求的概率更高,而其他维护要求相当。下颌覆盖义齿的固位体需要更频繁地拧紧,而上颌覆盖义齿的固位体则不需要。

结论

支持下颌和上颌杆固位覆盖义齿的种植体具有相似的种植体周围软组织效果和总体修复体生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验