Kurnatowska Agnieszka K, Kwaśniewska Jolanta
Zakład Leczenia Chorób Pasozytniczych i Grzybic, Katedra Biologii i Parazytologii Lekarskiej, Uniwersytet Medyczny, pl. Gen. J. Hallera 1, 90-647 Łódź.
Wiad Parazytol. 2009;55(4):415-23.
It is known that fungi representing different genera and species can cause organ-limited or systemic infections after disrupting of the natural defense mechanisms in a human organism. The treatment of mycoses still encounters considerable difficulties. Therefore, in vitro assessment of the susceptibility of fungal strains to the antifungal agents now in use and to new drugs is needed more urgently than ever before. It should be emphasized that we treat the fungal susceptibility to antifungal drugs as a quantitative feature of the strain examined. The aim of the presently reported study was the evaluation of the antimycotic action of two azole compounds--miconazole and itraconazole (Janssen) against 205 Candida strains isolated from the various biological specimens of two groups of patients--hospitalized (group 1) and examined in outpatient clinic (group 2); differentiation of species and codes of these strains; analysis of dose-response curves and parameters of polygons of the azoles minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC). The susceptibility to miconazole and itraconazole was estimated with the agar diffusion test on 3% Sabouraud's agar--the method developed in our laboratory, using several different concentrations of the drug, which made the plotting of dose-response curves possible. The lowest concentration inhibiting the growth of fungal strain (MIC) was calculated using a transformed equation of rectilinear regression according to Kadłubowski. Species and fungal codes of isolated strains were evaluated according to the guidelines worked out in our department with the use of different media and biochemical tests (bioMérieux). Among 89 strains isolated from the hospitalized patients, six species of the genus Candida genus were found; one strain belonged to Trichosporon cutaneum species. The most frequently encountered species was Candida albicans (73%), which significantly dominated over C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, C. lipolytica and C. famata. All strains from the second group of patients belonged to C. albicans species. In all C. albicans strains from both groups of patients, the most frequent assimilation code (2576174) was found. The miconazole MIC values for Candida strains isolated from the group 1 were characterized by a wide range of variation, from 0.0247 mg/l to 6.826 mg/l, from group 2 - 0.0277 to 0.719 mg/l. The itraconazole MIC values were 0.011 to 2.813 mg/l, and 0.0103 to 0.718 mg/l, respectively. The analysis of mean values (x) of miconazole and itraconazole MICs and other parameters allowed us to find that the strains isolated from the patients of group 1 were significantly less susceptible to both drugs in comparison with the strains of the group 2 patients. Also, C. albicans strains from this group of patients had a significantly lower (x) MIC in comparison to the mean values for the most of Candida species isolated from the hospitalized patients (P < 0.001). In conclusion, we have found that the most Candida strains from both groups of patients were susceptible to the examined antifungal agents. The strains isolated from the outpatient clinic patients were generally more susceptible especially to itraconazole in comparison with strains from hospitalized patients.
众所周知,代表不同属和种的真菌在破坏人体自然防御机制后可引起器官局限性或全身性感染。真菌病的治疗仍然面临相当大的困难。因此,目前比以往任何时候都更迫切需要对真菌菌株对现有抗真菌药物和新药的敏感性进行体外评估。应该强调的是,我们将真菌对抗真菌药物的敏感性视为所检测菌株的一个定量特征。本报告研究的目的是评估两种唑类化合物——咪康唑和伊曲康唑(杨森公司)对从两组患者(住院患者(第1组)和门诊检查患者(第2组))的各种生物标本中分离出的205株念珠菌菌株的抗真菌作用;区分这些菌株的种类和编号;分析剂量反应曲线和唑类最低抑菌浓度(MIC)多边形参数。使用在我们实验室开发的方法,在3%沙保弱琼脂上通过琼脂扩散试验评估对咪康唑和伊曲康唑的敏感性,该方法使用几种不同浓度的药物,从而能够绘制剂量反应曲线。根据卡德鲁博夫斯基的直线回归变换方程计算抑制真菌菌株生长的最低浓度(MIC)。根据我们科室制定的指南,使用不同培养基和生化试验(生物梅里埃公司)评估分离菌株的种类和真菌编号。在从住院患者中分离出的89株菌株中,发现了念珠菌属的6个种;1株属于皮状丝孢酵母种。最常见的种是白色念珠菌(73%),明显多于热带念珠菌、近平滑念珠菌、光滑念珠菌、解脂念珠菌和法塔念珠菌。第二组患者的所有菌株均属于白色念珠菌。在两组患者的所有白色念珠菌菌株中,发现了最常见的同化编号(2576174)。从第1组分离出的念珠菌菌株的咪康唑MIC值变化范围很广,从0.0247mg/l到6.826mg/l,从第2组分离出的菌株的MIC值为0.0277到0.719mg/l。伊曲康唑的MIC值分别为0.011到2.813mg/l和0.0103到0.718mg/l。对咪康唑和伊曲康唑MIC的平均值(x)及其他参数的分析使我们发现,与第2组患者的菌株相比,从第1组患者中分离出的菌株对两种药物的敏感性明显较低。此外,与从住院患者中分离出的大多数念珠菌种的平均值相比,该组患者的白色念珠菌菌株的MIC明显较低(P<0.001)。总之,我们发现两组患者的大多数念珠菌菌株对所检测的抗真菌药物敏感。与住院患者的菌株相比,门诊患者分离出的菌株通常更敏感,尤其是对伊曲康唑。