Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61603, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Mar;45(3):606-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.06.013.
The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes after a minimally invasive approach to pediatric subcutaneous abscess management as a replacement for wide exposure, debridement, and repetitive packing.
A retrospective study was performed of all children who underwent incision and loop drainage for subcutaneous abscesses between January 2002 and October 2007 at our institution.
Two mini incisions, 4-5 mm each, were made on the abscess, as far apart as possible. Abscess was probed, and pus was drained. Abscess was irrigated with normal saline; a loop drain was passed through one incision, brought out through the other, and tied to itself. An absorbent dressing was applied over the loop and changed regularly.
One hundred fifteen patients underwent drainage procedures as described; 5 patients had multiple abscesses. Mean values (range) are as follows: age, 4.25 years (19 days to 20.5 years); duration of symptoms, 7.8 days (1-42 days); length of hospital stay, 3 days (1-39 days); duration of procedure, 10.8 minutes (4-43 minutes); drain duration, 10.4 days (3-24 days); and number of postoperative visits, 1.8 (1-17). Bacterial culture data were available for 101 patients. Of these, 50% had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 26% had methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and 9% streptococcal species. Of the 115 patients, 5 had pilonidal abscesses, 1 required reoperation for persistent drainage, and 1 had a planned staged excision. Of the remaining 110 patients, 6 (5.5%) required reoperation-4 with loop drains and 2 with incision and packing with complete healing.
The use of loop drains proved safe and effective in the treatment of subcutaneous abscesses in children. Eliminating the need for repetitive and cumbersome wound packing simplifies postoperative wound care. Furthermore, there is an expected cost savings with this technique given the decreased need for wound care materials and professional postoperative home health services. We recommend this minimally invasive technique as the treatment of choice for subcutaneous abscesses in children and consider it the standard of care in our facility.
本研究旨在评估微创方法治疗小儿皮下脓肿的效果,以替代广泛切开、清创和反复填塞。
对我院 2002 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月期间接受切开引流和环扎引流的所有皮下脓肿患儿进行回顾性研究。
在脓肿处做两个 4-5mm 的小切口,尽可能远离。探查脓肿,排出脓液。用生理盐水冲洗脓肿,将环扎引流管穿过一个切口,从另一个切口引出,然后将其自身系紧。将吸收性敷料敷在环扎引流管上,并定期更换。
115 例患儿行上述引流术,5 例患儿有多个脓肿。平均(范围)值如下:年龄 4.25 岁(19 天至 20.5 岁);症状持续时间 7.8 天(1-42 天);住院时间 3 天(1-39 天);手术时间 10.8 分钟(4-43 分钟);引流时间 10.4 天(3-24 天);术后就诊次数 1.8 次(1-17 次)。101 例患儿的细菌培养数据如下:50%为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,26%为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌,9%为链球菌属。115 例患儿中,5 例为藏毛窦脓肿,1 例因持续引流而需再次手术,1 例计划分期切除。其余 110 例患儿中,6 例(5.5%)需再次手术,其中 4 例使用环扎引流,2 例使用切开和填塞,均完全愈合。
环扎引流在治疗小儿皮下脓肿方面安全有效。消除反复而繁琐的伤口填塞,简化了术后伤口护理。此外,由于减少了伤口护理材料和专业的术后家庭健康服务需求,该技术具有预期的成本节约。我们建议将这种微创技术作为小儿皮下脓肿的治疗选择,并将其视为我们机构的标准治疗方法。