• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

党派之争致医保缺失。

A partisan divide on the uninsured.

机构信息

Harvard University Health Policy, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):706-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1019. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1019
PMID:20223799
Abstract

The partisan split in Congress over health reform may reflect a broader divide among the public in attitudes toward the uninsured. Despite expert consensus over the harms suffered by the uninsured as a group, Americans disagree over whether the uninsured get the care they need and whether reform legislation providing universal coverage is necessary. We examined public perceptions of health care access and quality for the uninsured over time, and we found that Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to believe that the uninsured have difficulty gaining access to care. Senior citizens are less aware than others of the problems faced by the uninsured. Even among those Americans who perceive that the uninsured have poor access to care, Republicans are significantly less likely than Democrats to support reform. Thus, our findings indicate that even if political obstacles are overcome and health reform is enacted, future political support for ongoing financing to cover the uninsured could be uncertain.

摘要

国会在医疗改革问题上的党派分歧可能反映了公众在对待无保险人群态度上的更广泛分歧。尽管专家一致认为无保险人群作为一个群体遭受了伤害,但美国人对于无保险者是否得到了他们所需的护理以及提供全民覆盖的改革立法是否必要存在分歧。我们研究了公众对无保险者获得医疗保健的看法和质量随时间的变化,发现民主党人远比共和党人更有可能认为无保险者难以获得护理。老年人比其他人更不清楚无保险者面临的问题。即使在那些认为无保险者获得医疗服务的机会很差的美国人中,共和党人支持改革的可能性也明显低于民主党人。因此,我们的研究结果表明,即使克服了政治障碍并颁布了医疗改革,未来对为无保险者提供持续资金的政治支持也可能不确定。

相似文献

1
A partisan divide on the uninsured.党派之争致医保缺失。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):706-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1019. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
2
A universal healthcare system: is it right for the United States?全民医疗保健系统:它适合美国吗?
Nurs Forum. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00060.x.
3
The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008-2010: partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment.2008-2010 年医疗保健意见的动态:党派偏见、自身利益和种族怨恨。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):945-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460533.
4
Children in the United States with discontinuous health insurance coverage.美国医疗保险覆盖间断的儿童。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):382-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa043878.
5
The role of health insurance in explaining immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to health care: comparing the United States to Canada.医疗保险在解释移民与非移民在获得医疗保健方面的差异中所起的作用:美国与加拿大的比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1452-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.030. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
6
Uninsured and unstably insured: the importance of continuous insurance coverage.未参保及参保不稳定:持续保险覆盖的重要性。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 2):187-206.
7
A universal access plan: a step toward national health insurance?一项全民医保计划:迈向国家医疗保险的一步?
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1992 Spring;37(1):37-51.
8
Access isn't the main event. For most Americans who have coverage, cost of care is the biggest issue.医保覆盖范围并非主要问题。对于大多数享有医保的美国人来说,医疗费用才是最大的问题。
Mod Healthc. 2007;37(51):23.
9
From data to policy ... to politics. The Minnesotans health care plan for universal access to care.从数据到政策……再到政治。明尼苏达人全民医疗保健计划。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Nov;152(11):2222-8.
10
Do we really want broad access to health care?我们真的希望医疗保健能够广泛普及吗?
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1260-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb043863.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of women, infant, and children (WIC) services on birth weight before and during the 2007-2009 great recession in Washington state and Florida: a pooled cross-sectional time series analysis.妇女、婴儿和儿童 (WIC) 服务对华盛顿州和佛罗里达州 2007-2009 年大衰退前后出生体重的影响:一项基于群组的横断时间序列分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02937-5.
2
Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010.大衰退时期(2005-2010 年)的健康社会决定因素与产前保健利用差距。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2486-1.
3
Modeling factors explaining physicians' satisfaction with competence.
解释医生对自身能力满意度的建模因素。
SAGE Open Med. 2015 Nov 9;3:2050312115613352. doi: 10.1177/2050312115613352. eCollection 2015.