Soules M R, Bremner W J, Steiner R A, Clifton D K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 May;72(5):986-92. doi: 10.1210/jcem-72-5-986.
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) as a clinical infertility problem is considered to have a heterogeneous etiology. Hyperprolactinemia has long been considered a causative factor of LPD. In this context we investigated PRL secretion in 18 women with LPD. All of the subjects were infertile with 2 out of phase (greater than 2 days) endometrial biopsies; 10 of the women also had daily blood samples, this latter subgroup had significantly decreased integrated luteal phase progesterone (P) levels compared to normal women with in-phase biopsies. PRL secretion was investigated as follows: 1) daily blood levels; 2) pulsatile secretion patterns in 3 cycle phase [early follicular (12 h); late follicular (12 h); midluteal (24 h)], 3) LH-PRL coupling, and 4) nocturnal patterns. Results were compared to findings in 36 normal women. The mean daily levels of PRL over the menstrual cycle were not different between the two groups (LPD, 12.1 +/- 1.5; normal, 13.8 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = 0.3). There was no correlation between luteal phase integrated P and PRL levels for either group. There was a small difference in the PRL pulse amplitude in the early follicular phase between the LPD and normal women (2.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.3 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in PRL pulse frequency or mean level during the 12 or 24 h in any cycle phase. There was an equivalent amount of LH-PRL pulse coupling in both groups in all three cycle phases. Diurnal and nocturnal PRL secretion was studied by breaking the 24 h data (midluteal) into day (0700-2300 h) and night (2300-0700) segments. Mean PRL levels were higher at night in both groups (LPD, 15.9 vs. 12.6; normal, 15.4 vs. 9.3 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05), as expected. There were no differences in nocturnal PRL secretory patterns between the two groups. In summary, we have serious reservations whether abnormalities in PRL secretion are a common or integral part of the pathophysiology of LPD. From previous work we know these subtle abnormalities in PRL secretion in LPD are associated with definite abnormalities in gonadotropin secretion. We believe these gonadotropin abnormalities are probably more significant in terms of decreased P secretion.
黄体期缺陷(LPD)作为一种临床不孕症问题,被认为病因具有异质性。高催乳素血症长期以来一直被视为LPD的一个致病因素。在此背景下,我们对18例LPD女性的催乳素(PRL)分泌情况进行了研究。所有受试者均不孕,子宫内膜活检有2个不同步(大于2天);其中10名女性还每天采集血样,与子宫内膜活检同步的正常女性相比,后一亚组的黄体期孕酮(P)综合水平显著降低。PRL分泌情况研究如下:1)每日血药浓度;2)3个周期阶段[卵泡早期(12小时);卵泡晚期(12小时);黄体中期(24小时)]的脉冲分泌模式,3)促黄体生成素(LH)-PRL偶联,以及4)夜间模式。将结果与36名正常女性的结果进行比较。两组在整个月经周期中PRL的平均每日水平无差异(LPD组为12.1±1.5;正常组为13.8±0.8微克/升;P = 0.3)。两组的黄体期P综合水平与PRL水平之间均无相关性。LPD组与正常女性在卵泡早期的PRL脉冲幅度存在微小差异(2.6±0.3对5.5±1.3微克/升;P<0.05)。在任何周期阶段的12小时或24小时内,两组在PRL脉冲频率或平均水平上均无显著差异。在所有三个周期阶段,两组的LH-PRL脉冲偶联量相当。通过将24小时数据(黄体中期)分为白天(07:00 - 23:00时)和夜间(23:00 - 07:00时)段来研究PRL的昼夜分泌情况。两组夜间的PRL平均水平均较高(LPD组为15.9对12.6;正常组为15.4对9.3微克/升;P<0.05),这与预期相符。两组在夜间PRL分泌模式上无差异。总之,我们对PRL分泌异常是否是LPD病理生理学的常见或重要组成部分持严重保留态度。从之前的研究工作中我们知道,LPD中PRL分泌的这些细微异常与促性腺激素分泌的明确异常有关。我们认为就P分泌减少而言,这些促性腺激素异常可能更具重要性。