Government Medical College and Hospital, Central Library, Chandigarh, India.
Neurol India. 2010 Jan-Feb;58(1):35-41. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.60393.
OBJECTIVE: This study analyses the research output in India in neurosciences during the period 1999-2008 and the analyses included research growth, rank, global publications' share, citation impact, share of international collaborative papers and major collaborative partner countries and patterns of research communication in most productive journals. It also analyses the characteristics of most productive institutions, authors and high-cited papers. The publication output and impact of India is also compared with China, Brazil and South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scopus Citation database was used for retrieving the publications' output of India and other countries in neurosciences during 1999-2008. RESULTS: India's global publications' share in neurosciences during the study period was 0.99% (with 4503 papers) and it ranked 21 st among the top 26 countries in neurosciences. The average annual publication growth rate was 11.37%, shared 17.34% of international collaborative papers and the average citation per paper was 4.21. India was far behind China, Brazil and South Korea in terms of publication output, citation quality and share of international collaborative papers in neurosciences. CONCLUSION: India is far behind in terms of publication output, citation quality and share of international collaborative papers in neurosciences when compared to other countries with an emerging economy. There is an urgent need to substantially increase the research activities in the field of neurosciences in India.
目的:本研究分析了 1999-2008 年期间印度在神经科学领域的研究成果,分析内容包括研究增长、排名、全球出版物份额、引用影响力、国际合作论文份额以及主要合作伙伴国家和最具生产力期刊的研究交流模式。它还分析了最具生产力机构、作者和高引用论文的特点。还将印度的出版产出和影响力与中国、巴西和韩国进行了比较。
材料和方法:使用 Scopus 引文数据库检索了印度和其他国家在 1999-2008 年期间在神经科学领域的出版物产出。
结果:在研究期间,印度在神经科学领域的全球出版物份额为 0.99%(发表了 4503 篇论文),在神经科学领域排名前 26 位的国家中排名第 21 位。平均年增长率为 11.37%,分享了 17.34%的国际合作论文,平均每篇论文的引用量为 4.21。在神经科学领域的出版物产出、引文质量和国际合作论文份额方面,印度远远落后于中国、巴西和韩国。
结论:与其他新兴经济体国家相比,印度在神经科学领域的出版产出、引文质量和国际合作论文份额方面都远远落后。印度迫切需要大幅增加神经科学领域的研究活动。
J Vector Borne Dis. 2011-9
Asian J Psychiatr. 2013-2-28
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021-2
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021-1
Natl Med J India. 1998
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018-9-10
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013-10
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013-4
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012-7
Indian J Med Res. 2010-11