Medical College of Georgia, School of Dentistry, Room AD-3273, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Augusta, GA 30912-1260, USA.
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010 Mar;10(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.010.
The study subjects were 507 children (228 females and 279 males) from the Casa Pia school system in Lisbon, Portugal; the same cohort of children used in a previous study. The children were 8 to 12 years old at the time of enrollment in the study, which began in January of 1997. To be included in the study, a child must have had at baseline at least one carious lesion in a permanent tooth, no previous exposure to amalgam treatments, urinary mercury level less than 10 mg/L, blood lead level less than 15 mg/dL, IQ greater than or equal to 67 as obtained with the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, and no interfering health condition.
KEY EXPOSURE/STUDY FACTOR: Study subjects were randomly assigned to receive dental treatment with either amalgam or resin-based composite for posterior restorations (and composite for all anterior restorations). By the end of year 1, the participants had a mean of 8.3 surfaces restored with amalgam, and the mean number of surfaces restored varied between 7.7 and 10.7 during the 7 years of follow-up.
The primary outcome measures for the study were the presence of neurological hard signs (NHSs), such as tremor, and the presence and severity of neurological soft signs (NSSs), such as synkinesias. NHSs were scored as present or absent. Tremor was reported separately from other NHSs because of its relationship to mercury toxicity. Observation of NSSs did not begin until follow-up year 2, so there were no baseline data for NSSs. NSSs were evaluated using the examination described by Peters et al, and each item was scored from 0 (absent) to 3 (maximum deviation).
Over the 7-year duration of the study, there were slight differences in the percentages of subjects exhibiting any NHSs (including tremor, which was reported separately) between the 2 treatment groups, but the directions of the differences were not consistent from year to year, and the differences were not statistically significant in any year. No statistically significant difference in NSSs--either percentage of subjects exhibiting NSSs or NSS severity scores--was observed between the 2 groups in any year.
The results of this study demonstrate that exposure to mercury from dental amalgam does not adversely affect neurological development in children.
研究对象为葡萄牙里斯本 Casa Pia 学校系统的 507 名儿童(228 名女性和 279 名男性);这是之前一项研究中使用的同一队列的儿童。在研究开始于 1997 年 1 月时,儿童的年龄为 8 至 12 岁。要纳入研究,儿童在基线时必须至少有一颗恒牙有龋齿,以前没有接受过汞合金治疗,尿汞水平低于 10mg/L,血铅水平低于 15mg/dL,智商大于或等于 67,用非言语智力综合测试获得,且无干扰健康状况。
主要暴露/研究因素:研究对象被随机分配接受汞合金或树脂基复合材料进行后牙修复(以及所有前牙修复用复合材料)。到第 1 年末,参与者平均有 8.3 个表面用汞合金修复,在 7 年的随访期间,修复表面的平均值在 7.7 到 10.7 之间变化。
研究的主要结果是存在神经硬体征(NHSs),如震颤,以及存在和严重程度的神经软体征(NSSs),如协同运动。NHSs 评分存在或不存在。由于震颤与汞毒性有关,因此单独报告了震颤以外的其他 NHSs。观察 NSSs 直到随访第 2 年才开始,因此 NSSs 没有基线数据。使用 Peters 等人描述的检查评估 NSSs,每个项目的评分从 0(不存在)到 3(最大偏差)。
在研究的 7 年期间,两组之间出现任何 NHSs(包括单独报告的震颤)的受试者百分比在各个年份略有不同,但差异的方向不一致,并且在任何一年都没有统计学意义。在任何一年,两组之间都没有观察到 NSSs(包括出现 NSSs 的受试者百分比或 NSS 严重程度评分)存在统计学显著差异。
研究结果表明,儿童接触汞合金中的汞不会对其神经发育产生不利影响。