Centre for Water Resources Research, School of Architecture, Landscape and Civil Engineering, Newstead Building, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 Aug;17(7):1314-22. doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0311-5. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
CONCEPT AND PURPOSE: Virtually all water treatment facilities worldwide generate an enormous amount of water treatment residual (WTR) solids for which environmentally friendly end-use options are continually being sought as opposed to their landfilling. Aluminium-based WTR (Al-WTR) can offer huge benefits particularly for phosphorus (P) removal and biofilm attachment when used as media in engineered wetlands. However, potential environmental risks that may arise from the leaching out of its constituents must be properly evaluated before such reuse can be assured. This paper presents results of an assessment carried out to monitor and examine the leachability and leaching patterns of the constituents of an Al-WTR used as media in laboratory-scale engineered wetland systems.
MAIN FEATURES, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Al-WTR was used as media in four different configurations of laboratory-scale engineered wetland systems treating agricultural wastewater. Selected metal levels were determined in the Al-WTR prior to being used while levels of total and dissolved concentration for the metals were monitored in the influent and effluent samples. The increase or decrease of these metals in the used Al-WTR and their potential for leaching were determined. Leached metal levels in the effluents were compared with relevant environmental quality standards to ascertain if they pose considerable risks.
Aluminium, arsenic, iron, lead and manganese were leached into the treated effluent, but aluminium exhibited the least leaching potential relative to its initial content in the fresh Al-WTR. Levels of P increased from 0.13 mg-P/g (fresh Al-WTR) to 33.9-40.6 mg-P/g (used Al-WTR). Dissolved levels of lead and arsenic (except on one instance) were below the prescribed limits for discharge. However, total and dissolved levels of aluminium were in most cases above the prescribed limits for discharge, especially at the beginning of the experiments.
CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Overall, the study indicates that leaching is observed when Al-WTR is beneficially reused for enhanced P removal in engineered wetlands. In particular, levels of aluminium in the treated effluent beyond the prescribed limits of 0.2 mg/l were observed. However, since the results obtained indicate that aluminium leached is mostly associated with solids, a post-treatment unit which can further reduce the level of aluminium in the treated effluent by filtering out the solids could serve to mitigate this. In addition, plants used in such wetland systems can uptake metals and this can also be a potential solution to ameliorating such metal releases. Periodic monitoring is thus advised. Notwithstanding, the use of Al-WTR as a media in engineered wetlands can serve to greatly enhance the removal of P from wastewaters and also serve as support material for biofilm attachment.
概念与目的:世界上几乎所有的水处理设施都会产生大量的水处理残余物(WTR)固体,人们一直在寻找环保的最终用途选择,而不是将其填埋。基于铝的 WTR(Al-WTR)在用作工程湿地中的介质时,特别是在去除磷(P)和生物膜附着方面,可以带来巨大的好处。然而,在这种再利用得到保证之前,必须对其成分浸出可能带来的潜在环境风险进行适当评估。本文介绍了对一种用于实验室规模工程湿地系统的 Al-WTR 进行浸出性和浸出模式监测和评估的结果。
主要特点、材料和方法:Al-WTR 被用作四种不同配置的实验室规模工程湿地系统处理农业废水的介质。在使用之前,测定了 Al-WTR 中的选定金属水平,同时监测了进水和出水样品中金属的总浓度和溶解浓度。确定了这些金属在使用的 Al-WTR 中的增减情况及其浸出潜力。将流出物中的浸出金属水平与相关环境质量标准进行比较,以确定它们是否构成重大风险。
铝、砷、铁、铅和锰被浸出到处理后的废水中,但与新鲜 Al-WTR 中的初始含量相比,铝的浸出潜力最小。P 的水平从 0.13mg-P/g(新鲜 Al-WTR)增加到 33.9-40.6mg-P/g(使用的 Al-WTR)。除了一次例外,铅和砷的溶解水平都低于规定的排放限值。然而,在大多数情况下,进水和出水的铝总浓度和溶解浓度都高于规定的排放限值,尤其是在实验开始时。
结论、建议和展望:总体而言,该研究表明,当 Al-WTR 被有益地再用于增强工程湿地中的磷去除时,会观察到浸出。特别是,在处理后的废水中观察到超过规定限值 0.2mg/l 的铝水平。然而,由于所获得的结果表明,浸出的铝主要与固体有关,因此可以使用后处理单元通过过滤固体进一步降低处理后废水中的铝水平,以减轻这种情况。此外,此类湿地系统中使用的植物可以吸收金属,这也可以是缓解这种金属释放的潜在解决方案。因此建议进行定期监测。尽管如此,Al-WTR 作为工程湿地中的介质使用,可以大大提高废水中磷的去除率,并作为生物膜附着的支撑材料。