Suppr超能文献

降调矫形器对中风后痉挛患者站立时比目鱼肌反射兴奋性的影响。

The effect of tone-reducing orthotic devices on soleus muscle reflex excitability while standing in patients with spasticity following stroke.

作者信息

Ibuki Aileen, Bach Timothy, Rogers Douglas, Bernhardt Julie

机构信息

Division of Allied Health, National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010 Mar;34(1):46-57. doi: 10.3109/03093640903476802.

Abstract

Orthoses are commonly prescribed for the management of spasticity but their neurophysiologic effect on spasticity remains unsubstantiated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of three tone-reducing devices (dynamic foot orthosis, muscle stretch, and orthokinetic compression garment) on soleus muscle reflex excitability while standing in patients with spasticity following stroke. A repeated measures intervention study was conducted on 13 patients with stroke selected from a sample of convenience. A custom-made dynamic foot orthosis, a range of motion walker to stretch the soleus muscle and class 1 and class 2 orthokinetic compression garments were assessed using the ratio of maximum Hoffmann reflex amplitude to maximum M-response amplitude (Hmax:Mmax) to determine their effect on soleus muscle reflex excitability. Only 10 subjects were able to complete the testing. There were no significant treatment effects for the interventions (F=1.208, df=3.232, p=0.328); however, when analyzed subject-by-subject, two subjects responded to the dynamic foot orthosis and one of those two subjects also responded to the class 1 orthokinetic compression garment. Overall, the results demonstrated that the tone-reducing devices had no significant effect on soleus reflex excitability suggesting that these tone-reducing orthotic devices have no significant neurophysiologic effect on spasticity.

摘要

矫形器常用于治疗痉挛,但它们对痉挛的神经生理作用仍未得到证实。本研究的目的是调查三种减张装置(动态足矫形器、肌肉拉伸和动静态加压服)对中风后痉挛患者站立时比目鱼肌反射兴奋性的影响。对13例便利抽样选取的中风患者进行了重复测量干预研究。使用最大霍夫曼反射幅度与最大M反应幅度之比(Hmax:Mmax)评估定制的动态足矫形器、用于拉伸比目鱼肌的活动度助行器以及1级和2级动静态加压服,以确定它们对比目鱼肌反射兴奋性的影响。只有10名受试者能够完成测试。干预措施没有显著的治疗效果(F=1.208,自由度=3.232,p=0.328);然而,逐受试者分析时,两名受试者对动态足矫形器有反应,这两名受试者中的一名对1级动静态加压服也有反应。总体而言,结果表明减张装置对比目鱼肌反射兴奋性没有显著影响,提示这些减张矫形装置对痉挛没有显著的神经生理作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验