Ibuki Aileen, Bach Timothy, Rogers Douglas, Bernhardt Julie
Division of Allied Health, National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010 Mar;34(1):46-57. doi: 10.3109/03093640903476802.
Orthoses are commonly prescribed for the management of spasticity but their neurophysiologic effect on spasticity remains unsubstantiated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of three tone-reducing devices (dynamic foot orthosis, muscle stretch, and orthokinetic compression garment) on soleus muscle reflex excitability while standing in patients with spasticity following stroke. A repeated measures intervention study was conducted on 13 patients with stroke selected from a sample of convenience. A custom-made dynamic foot orthosis, a range of motion walker to stretch the soleus muscle and class 1 and class 2 orthokinetic compression garments were assessed using the ratio of maximum Hoffmann reflex amplitude to maximum M-response amplitude (Hmax:Mmax) to determine their effect on soleus muscle reflex excitability. Only 10 subjects were able to complete the testing. There were no significant treatment effects for the interventions (F=1.208, df=3.232, p=0.328); however, when analyzed subject-by-subject, two subjects responded to the dynamic foot orthosis and one of those two subjects also responded to the class 1 orthokinetic compression garment. Overall, the results demonstrated that the tone-reducing devices had no significant effect on soleus reflex excitability suggesting that these tone-reducing orthotic devices have no significant neurophysiologic effect on spasticity.
矫形器常用于治疗痉挛,但它们对痉挛的神经生理作用仍未得到证实。本研究的目的是调查三种减张装置(动态足矫形器、肌肉拉伸和动静态加压服)对中风后痉挛患者站立时比目鱼肌反射兴奋性的影响。对13例便利抽样选取的中风患者进行了重复测量干预研究。使用最大霍夫曼反射幅度与最大M反应幅度之比(Hmax:Mmax)评估定制的动态足矫形器、用于拉伸比目鱼肌的活动度助行器以及1级和2级动静态加压服,以确定它们对比目鱼肌反射兴奋性的影响。只有10名受试者能够完成测试。干预措施没有显著的治疗效果(F=1.208,自由度=3.232,p=0.328);然而,逐受试者分析时,两名受试者对动态足矫形器有反应,这两名受试者中的一名对1级动静态加压服也有反应。总体而言,结果表明减张装置对比目鱼肌反射兴奋性没有显著影响,提示这些减张矫形装置对痉挛没有显著的神经生理作用。