Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Horsham, West Sussex, UK.
Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;159(7):1429-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00623.x. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
We have previously shown that SB265610 (1-(2-bromo-phenyl)-3-(7-cyano-3H-benzotriazol-4-yl)-urea) behaves as an allosteric, inverse agonist at the C-X-C chemokine (CXCR)2 receptor. The aim of this study was to determine whether SB265610, in addition to two other known antagonists, bind to either of the two putative, topographically distinct, allosteric binding sites previously reported in the Literature.
Ten single point mutations were introduced into the CXCR2 receptor using site-directed mutagenesis. Three CXCR2 antagonists were investigated, SB265610, Pteridone-1 (2-(2,3 difluoro-benzylsulphanyl)-4-((R)-2-hydroxy-1-methyl-ethylamino)-8H-pteridin-7-one) and Sch527123 (2-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-{2-[[(R)-1-(5-methyl-furan-2-yl)-propyl]amino]-3,4-dioxo-cyclobut-1enylamino}-benzamide), and the effect of these mutations on their binding affinity and ability to inhibit interleukin-8-stimulated binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS was examined.
Seven of the nine mutations introduced into the C-terminal domain and intracellular loops of the receptor produced a significant reduction in affinity at least one of the antagonists tested. Of those seven mutations, three produced a significant reduction in the affinity of all three antagonists, namely K320A, Y314A and D84N. In all but one mutation, the changes observed on antagonist affinity were matched with effects on inhibition of interleukin-8-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding.
These antagonists bind to a common intracellular, allosteric, binding site of the CXCR2 receptor, which has been further delineated. As many of these mutations are close to the site of G protein coupling or to a region of the receptor that is responsible for the transduction of the activation signal, our results suggest a molecular mechanism for the inhibition of receptor activation.
我们之前已经表明,SB265610(1-(2-溴苯基)-3-(7-氰基-3H-苯并三唑-4-基)-脲)作为 CXCR2 受体的别构反向激动剂发挥作用。本研究的目的是确定 SB265610 以及另外两种已知的拮抗剂是否与文献中先前报道的两种假定的拓扑上不同的别构结合位点之一结合。
使用定点诱变技术在 CXCR2 受体中引入了 10 个单点突变。研究了三种 CXCR2 拮抗剂,SB265610、Pteridone-1(2-(2,3 二氟-苄基硫基)-4-((R)-2-羟基-1-甲基-乙基氨基)-8H-蝶啶-7-酮)和 Sch527123(2-羟基-N,N-二甲基-3-[[(R)-1-(5-甲基-呋喃-2-基)-丙基]氨基]-3,4-二氧代-环丁-1 烯基氨基]-苯甲酰胺),并检查了这些突变对它们的结合亲和力和抑制白细胞介素-8 刺激的 [(35)S]GTPγS 结合的能力的影响。
在受体的 C 末端结构域和细胞内环中引入的 9 个突变中的 7 个导致至少一种测试拮抗剂的亲和力显著降低。在这 7 个突变中,3 个突变导致所有 3 种拮抗剂的亲和力显著降低,即 K320A、Y314A 和 D84N。在除一个突变外的所有突变中,观察到的拮抗剂亲和力变化与抑制白细胞介素-8 刺激的 [(35)S]GTPγS 结合的效应相匹配。
这些拮抗剂结合到 CXCR2 受体的共同细胞内别构结合位点,该结合位点已进一步描述。由于许多这些突变靠近 G 蛋白偶联的部位或负责转导激活信号的受体的区域,我们的结果表明了一种抑制受体激活的分子机制。