Hatemi A C, Gürsoy M, Tongut A, Kiliçkesmez K, Karaoğlu K, Küçükoğlu S, Kansiz E
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Cardiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Int Med Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;38(1):276-81. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800132.
The biatrial approach has been the classic means of access for left atrial myxoma resection. Increased surgical experience led cardiac surgeons to favour the uniatrial approach to reduce incisions and achieve adequate exposure. In this study, two unilateral surgical approaches were compared in 18 consecutive left atrial myxoma cases. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: left atriotomy (group 1, n = 9) and right atriotomy trans-septal approach (group 2, n = 9). Comparison criteria included pre- and post-operative functional capacity, cardiac rhythm, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary artery pressure, left atrial dimensions, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, drainage over 48 h post-operatively, units of blood transfused, extubation time and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. No significant between-group difference was observed in any criteria except aortic cross-clamp time, which was significantly longer in group 2 than in group 1. No recurrence of myxoma occurred in either group for the 15 patients followed up. Right atrial trans-septal incision appears to be as safe and effective as the left atriotomy approach for left atrial myxoma resection.
双心房入路一直是左心房黏液瘤切除术的经典手术入路。随着手术经验的增加,心脏外科医生倾向于采用单心房入路以减少切口并获得充分暴露。在本研究中,对连续18例左心房黏液瘤病例采用了两种单侧手术入路进行比较。根据手术入路将患者分为两组:左心房切开术(第1组,n = 9)和右心房切开经房间隔入路(第2组,n = 9)。比较标准包括术前和术后的功能能力、心律、左心室射血分数、肺动脉压、左心房大小、体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间、术后48小时引流量、输血量、拔管时间以及在重症监护病房和医院的住院时间。除主动脉阻断时间外,两组在任何标准上均未观察到显著差异,第2组的主动脉阻断时间显著长于第1组。在随访的15例患者中,两组均未出现黏液瘤复发。对于左心房黏液瘤切除术,右心房经房间隔切口似乎与左心房切开术入路一样安全有效。