Dryden Eileen, Hyde Justeen, Livny Ayala, Tula Monique
Institute for Community Health, 163 Gore Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Nov;33(4):386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
This paper highlights the value of utilizing a participatory evaluation approach when working with community agencies receiving federal funding for prevention and intervention services. Drawing from our experience as evaluators of a SAMHSA-funded substance abuse, HIV and Hepatitis prevention program targeting homeless young adults, we describe the importance of and strategies for creating a participatory evaluation partnership with program implementers. By participatory evaluation we mean the active involvement of program implementers in defining the evaluation, developing instruments, collecting data, discussing findings, and disseminating results. There are a number of challenges faced when using this approach with federally funded programs that require the use of standardized measurement tools and data collection procedures. Strategies we used to strike a balance between federal requirements and local needs are presented. By increasing the understanding of and participation in the evaluation process, program implementers have greater support for data collection requirements and are appreciably more interested in learning from the evaluation data. This approach has helped to build the capacity of a program and stimulated new possibilities for learning, growing, and ultimately improving the services offered to those the program strives to reach.
本文强调了在与接受联邦资金用于预防和干预服务的社区机构合作时,采用参与式评估方法的价值。借鉴我们作为物质滥用和精神健康服务管理局(SAMHSA)资助的针对无家可归青年成年人的药物滥用、艾滋病毒和肝炎预防项目评估人员的经验,我们阐述了与项目实施者建立参与式评估伙伴关系的重要性和策略。我们所说的参与式评估是指项目实施者积极参与评估的定义、工具开发、数据收集、结果讨论和结果传播。在将这种方法用于需要使用标准化测量工具和数据收集程序的联邦资助项目时,会面临许多挑战。本文介绍了我们为在联邦要求和地方需求之间取得平衡而采用的策略。通过增强对评估过程的理解和参与,项目实施者对数据收集要求有了更大的支持,并且对从评估数据中学习明显更感兴趣。这种方法有助于建设项目的能力,并激发学习、成长以及最终改善项目所服务对象的服务的新可能性。