Suppr超能文献

快速序贯诱导和插管:当前的争议。

Rapid sequence induction and intubation: current controversy.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology-West, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2010 May 1;110(5):1318-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d5ae47. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

Abstract

The changing opinion regarding some of the traditional components of rapid sequence induction and intubation (RSII) creates wide practice variations that impede attempts to establish a standard RSII protocol. There is controversy regarding the choice of induction drug, the dose, and the method of administration. Whereas some prefer the traditional rapid injection of a predetermined dose, others use the titration to loss of consciousness technique. The timing of neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) administration is different in both techniques. Whereas the NMBD should immediately follow the induction drug in the traditional technique, it is only given after establishing loss of consciousness in the titration technique. The optimal dose of succinylcholine is controversial with advocates and opponents for both higher and lower doses than the currently recommended 1.0 to 1.5 mg/kg dose. Defasciculation before succinylcholine was traditionally recommended in RSII but is currently controversial. Although the priming technique was advocated to accelerate onset of nondepolarizing NMBDs, its use has decreased because of potential complications and the introduction of rocuronium. Avoidance of manual ventilation before tracheal intubation was traditionally recommended to avoid gastric insufflation, but its use is currently acceptable and even recommended by some to avoid hypoxemia and to "test" the ability to mask ventilate. Cricoid pressure remains the most heated controversy; some believe in its effectiveness in preventing pulmonary aspiration, whereas others believe it should be abandoned because of the lack of scientific evidence of benefit and possible complications. There is still controversy regarding the best position and whether the head-up, head-down, or supine position is the safest during induction of anesthesia in full-stomach patients. These controversial components need to be discussed, studied, and resolved before establishing a standard RSII protocol.

摘要

关于一些传统的快速序列诱导和插管 (RSII) 组成部分的观点正在发生变化,这导致了广泛的实践差异,阻碍了建立标准 RSII 方案的尝试。关于诱导药物的选择、剂量和给药方法存在争议。虽然有些人更喜欢传统的快速注射预定剂量,但也有人使用滴定至意识丧失的技术。两种技术中神经肌肉阻滞剂 (NMBD) 的给药时间不同。在传统技术中,NMBD 应紧随诱导药物之后给予,而在滴定技术中,仅在意识丧失后给予 NMBD。琥珀胆碱的最佳剂量存在争议,支持者和反对者都主张使用高于或低于目前推荐的 1.0 至 1.5mg/kg 剂量。在 RSII 中,传统上推荐在使用琥珀胆碱前进行去神经支配,但目前存在争议。尽管推注技术被提倡用于加速非去极化 NMBD 的起效,但由于潜在的并发症和罗库溴铵的引入,其使用有所减少。传统上建议在气管插管前避免手动通气,以避免胃充气,但目前其使用是可以接受的,甚至被一些人推荐用于避免低氧血症和“测试”面罩通气的能力。环状软骨压力仍然是最具争议的问题;一些人相信它在预防肺误吸方面的有效性,而另一些人则认为由于缺乏科学证据表明其有益且可能存在并发症,因此应放弃使用。在饱胃患者进行麻醉诱导时,关于最佳体位以及头高位、头低位还是仰卧位是否最安全仍存在争议。在建立标准 RSII 方案之前,需要对这些有争议的成分进行讨论、研究和解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验