Suppr超能文献

纵向沟渠捕获污染地下水的可行性。

Viability of longitudinal trenches for capturing contaminated groundwater.

机构信息

Department of Geography and Environmental Science Program, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305279, Denton, TX 76203-5017, USA

出版信息

Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 Apr;84(4):418-21. doi: 10.1007/s00128-010-9962-7. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

Abstract

Using a groundwater flow and mass transport model, this study compared the capability of trenches with permeable backfill for capturing hypothetical contaminant plumes in homogeneous and heterogeneous unconfined aquifers. Longitudinal (parallel to groundwater flow), as well as conventional transverse (perpendicular to groundwater flow) trench configurations were considered. Alternate trench configurations intercepted the leading tip of an initial contaminant plume and had identical length, equal to the cross-gradient width of the plume. A longitudinal trench required 31% less time than its transverse counterpart to remediate a homogeneous aquifer. By contrast, in simulated heterogeneous aquifers, longitudinal remediation timeframes ranged from 41% less to 33% more than transverse trenches. Results suggest that longitudinal trenches may be a viable alternative for narrow contaminant plumes under low-groundwater velocity conditions, but may be impractical for plumes with wide leading tips, or in complex heterogeneous aquifers with divergent flow.

摘要

本研究使用地下水流动和物质迁移模型,比较了带渗透回填层的沟渠在捕获均质和非均质无压含水层中假设污染物羽流的能力。考虑了纵向(与地下水流平行)和传统的横向(垂直于地下水流)沟渠配置。交替沟渠配置截获了初始污染物羽流的前缘,且长度相同,等于羽流的横梯度宽度。与横向沟渠相比,纵向沟渠修复均质含水层所需的时间少 31%。相比之下,在模拟的非均质含水层中,纵向修复时间范围比横向沟渠少 41%到多 33%。结果表明,在低地下水流速条件下,纵向沟渠可能是狭窄污染物羽流的可行替代方案,但对于具有宽前缘的羽流,或者在具有发散流的复杂非均质含水层中,可能不切实际。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验