Paull J M, Joellenbeck L M, Cochran R C, Sidhu K S
Federal-State Toxicology and Regulatory Alliance Committee, Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment Division, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Feb;13(1):18-35. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-x.
Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.
我们从美国所有50个州收集了一份关于制定饮用水中化学污染物指南进展情况的全国调查问卷数据。23个州至少制定了部分自己的指南;其他27个州则依赖美国环境保护局(USEPA)或其他州先前制定的指南。自行制定指南的州通常采用美国环境保护局制定的毒理学标准和风险评估方法。在自行制定指南的23个州中,有14个州依靠美国环境保护局得出的致癌强度因子来确定致癌物基于风险的浓度。大多数州制定指南的依据是防止可能出现的超过百万分之一的额外癌症风险。这23个州中有17个州依靠口服参考剂量(RfD)来推导非致癌物的指南。对各州制定指南方法的审查和澄清表明,虽然通常采用类似的风险评估技术,但在假设、化学分类和不确定性因素方面的差异可能导致最终指导水平的差异。加强州与联邦政府之间的沟通与协调,可能有助于减少各州在制定化学污染物饮用水指南方面的差异和不一致性。