College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, 500 E Main St, Ste 230, Columbus, OH 43215, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Mar;16 Suppl Management:S48-54.
The major clinical guidelines recommend the use of acetaminophen (acetyl-para-aminophenol [APAP]) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) and only recommend the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after APAP failure. This recommendation is based on the efficacy of APAP in treating OA and its relatively benign side-effect profile compared with NSAIDs. NSAIDs are associated with a high risk of adverse events, particularly those of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. A large number of studies in OA have compared APAP with a variety of selective and nonselective NSAIDs and typically found greater efficacy with NSAIDs. This advantage, however, is mainly the result of increased efficacy in patients with more severe disease, and is viewed as a relatively small analgesic advantage in some studies and meta-analyses. Many of these same studies have reported little or no difference in safety between APAP and NSAIDs, but these results are typically based on short-term studies. Results from meta-analyses on the safety of NSAIDs almost unanimously confirm elevated risk of GI complications. The analgesic mechanism of APAP is still not well understood. However, the notion that APAP has no anti-inflammatory effect has been challenged in recent years with increasing data that suggest it may have an effect on inflammation distinct from that seen with NSAIDs. A variety of mechanistic hypotheses have been proposed.
主要临床指南建议使用对乙酰氨基酚(乙酰-对氨基酚[APAP])治疗轻度至中度骨关节炎(OA)症状,仅在 APAP 治疗失败后才建议使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。这一建议是基于 APAP 在治疗 OA 方面的疗效及其与 NSAIDs 相比相对良性的副作用谱。NSAIDs 与不良反应风险高相关,尤其是胃肠道(GI)方面的不良反应。大量 OA 研究比较了 APAP 与各种选择性和非选择性 NSAIDs,通常发现 NSAIDs 的疗效更好。然而,这种优势主要是由于在更严重疾病患者中疗效增加,并且在一些研究和荟萃分析中被视为相对较小的镇痛优势。许多相同的研究报告 APAP 和 NSAIDs 之间安全性差异不大或没有差异,但这些结果通常基于短期研究。对 NSAIDs 安全性的荟萃分析结果几乎一致证实 GI 并发症风险增加。APAP 的镇痛机制仍不完全清楚。然而,近年来越来越多的数据表明,APAP 可能对炎症有不同于 NSAIDs 的作用,这一观点挑战了 APAP 没有抗炎作用的观点。已经提出了各种机制假说。