Burns D D, Nolen-Hoeksema S
Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):305-11. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.305.
Factor analysis of the Self-Help Inventory (Burns, Shaw, & Crocker, 1987) in a group of 307 consecutive outpatients seeking cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for affective disorders revealed 3 factors that assessed the frequency with which subjects used active coping strategies when depressed, the perceived helpfulness of these coping strategies, and their willingness to learn new coping strategies. The Frequency and Helpfulness scales did not predict patients' subsequent compliance with self-help assignments or their rate of improvement during the first 12 weeks of treatment. These findings suggest that very resourceful patients are not better candidates for CBT than other patients and that patients' expectations about the value of active coping strategies do not predict the response to CBT. In contrast, the Willingness scale was correlated with the degree of improvement during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The Willingness scale and compliance with self-help assignments made additive and separate contributions to clinical improvement. Further research on motivational factors may be indicated.
对一组连续307名因情感障碍寻求认知行为疗法(CBT)的门诊患者进行的自助量表(伯恩斯、肖和克罗克,1987年)因素分析显示,有3个因素评估了受试者在抑郁时使用积极应对策略的频率、这些应对策略的感知帮助程度以及他们学习新应对策略的意愿。频率和帮助程度量表并不能预测患者随后对自助任务的依从性或治疗前12周的改善率。这些发现表明,资源丰富的患者并不比其他患者更适合接受CBT,并且患者对积极应对策略价值的期望并不能预测对CBT的反应。相比之下,意愿量表与治疗前12周的改善程度相关。意愿量表和对自助任务的依从性对临床改善有累加和单独的贡献。可能需要对动机因素进行进一步研究。