Suppr超能文献

女性沙眼衣原体、人型支原体和解脲脲原体感染。南非一家不孕不育诊所的患病率、风险及管理

Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum infections in women. Prevalence, risks and management at a South African infertility clinic.

作者信息

Marais N F, Wessels P H, Smith M S, Gericke A, Richter A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1991 Mar;36(3):161-4.

PMID:2030488
Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum infections not only jeopardize fertility but also pose a risk for infertility treatment and resulting pregnancies. Routine screening tests or empirical antibiotic treatment of infertile couples may be justified by the prevalence of these organisms. We studied the wives in 40 consecutive infertile couples. Monoclonal direct immunofluorescence (DIF) for C trachomatis was performed on fixed smears from endocervical swabs. M hominis and U urealyticum were isolated by inoculation of Hayflick (HF) medium, HF broth and Ureaplasma A7 agar with endocervical swabs. Using DIF, 11 (27.5%) specimens were positive, 25 (62.5%) were negative, and 4 (10.0%) were equivocal. DIF was repeated on smears from three of the last four patients; all three were positive for C trachomatis. One patient was lost to follow-up and excluded from the study. For the total 39 specimens the final results were 14 (35.9%) positive and 25 (64.1%) negative. M hominis was isolated from 3 (7.5%) endocervical swabs. None of the endocervical swabs yielded a culture positive for U urealyticum. Statistical analysis showed no correlation between the clinical history and presence of infection with any of the three organisms. The prevalence of 35.9% for C trachomatis was surprisingly high for an infertile population and, if supported by culture confirmation, justifies routine screening. The potential adverse effects of these organisms on the success rate of highly specialized infertility treatments are essentially unresolved. Since our analysis of cost effectiveness as applicable to our unit, all new infertile couples are treated empirically with lymecycline.

摘要

沙眼衣原体、人型支原体和解脲脲原体感染不仅会危及生育能力,还会给不孕治疗及后续妊娠带来风险。鉴于这些病原体的流行情况,对不孕夫妇进行常规筛查或经验性抗生素治疗可能是合理的。我们对连续40对不孕夫妇中的妻子进行了研究。采用单克隆直接免疫荧光法(DIF)检测宫颈拭子固定涂片上的沙眼衣原体。用人型支原体和解脲脲原体接种海弗利克(HF)培养基、HF肉汤及解脲脲原体A7琼脂,从宫颈拭子中分离人型支原体和解脲脲原体。采用DIF检测,11份标本(27.5%)呈阳性,25份(62.5%)呈阴性,4份(10.0%)结果不明确。对最后4例患者中的3例涂片重复进行DIF检测,结果均显示沙眼衣原体阳性。1例患者失访,被排除在研究之外。对于总共39份标本,最终结果为14份(35.9%)阳性,25份(64.1%)阴性。从3份(7.5%)宫颈拭子中分离出人型支原体。宫颈拭子培养均未出现解脲脲原体阳性。统计分析表明,临床病史与这三种病原体感染的存在之间无相关性。对于不孕人群,沙眼衣原体35.9%的感染率高得出奇,若能得到培养确认的支持,则有理由进行常规筛查。这些病原体对高度专业化不孕治疗成功率的潜在不良影响基本尚未明确。鉴于我们对适用于本单位的成本效益分析,所有新的不孕夫妇均接受了赖甲环素的经验性治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验