多中心临床试验伦理审查系统的案例研究评估 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

作者信息

Fitzpatrick Kate L, Boult Margaret, Fitridge Robert A

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):293. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03515.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03515.x

PMID:20306547

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):293. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03515.x.

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):292. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03514.x.

A case study of a single ethics committee for multicentre trials.

Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21;195(10):582-3. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10484.

[Ethics of observational studies: are specific rules useful?].

Epidemiol Prev. 2006 Jul-Oct;30(4-5):295-7.

RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies.

Science. 2015 Nov 6;350(6261):632-3. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4872.

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2009 Sep 7;191(5):280-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02786.x.

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):293. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03516.x.

Multiple competing interests surround ethical review of clinical trials.

Intern Med J. 2005 Nov;35(11):686-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00951.x.

A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.

ANZ J Surg. 2011 Mar;81(3):132-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05529.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.

Intern Med J. 2005 Nov;35(11):650-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00927.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):293. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03515.x.

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):292. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03514.x.

A case study of a single ethics committee for multicentre trials.

Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21;195(10):582-3. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10484.

[Ethics of observational studies: are specific rules useful?].

Epidemiol Prev. 2006 Jul-Oct;30(4-5):295-7.

RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies.

Science. 2015 Nov 6;350(6261):632-3. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4872.

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2009 Sep 7;191(5):280-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02786.x.

A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.

Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):293. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03516.x.

Multiple competing interests surround ethical review of clinical trials.

Intern Med J. 2005 Nov;35(11):686-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00951.x.

A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.

ANZ J Surg. 2011 Mar;81(3):132-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05529.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.

Intern Med J. 2005 Nov;35(11):650-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00927.x.