Language and Communication Science, City University, London, UK.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;28(Pt 1):51-69. doi: 10.1348/026151009x482642.
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) have difficulties with spoken language. However, some recent research suggests that these impairments reflect underlying cognitive limitations. Studying gesture may inform us clinically and theoretically about the nature of the association between language and cognition. A total of 20 children with SLI and 19 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on a novel measure of gesture production. Children were also assessed for sentence comprehension errors in a speech-gesture integration task. Children with SLI performed equally to peers on gesture production but performed less well when comprehending integrated speech and gesture. Error patterns revealed a significant group interaction: children with SLI made more gesture-based errors, whilst TD children made semantically based ones. Children with SLI accessed and produced lexically encoded gestures despite having impaired spoken vocabulary and this group also showed stronger associations between gesture and language than TD children. When SLI comprehension breaks down, gesture may be relied on over speech, whilst TD children have a preference for spoken cues. The findings suggest that for children with SLI, gesture scaffolds are still more related to language development than for TD peers who have out-grown earlier reliance on gestures. Future clinical implications may include standardized assessment of symbolic gesture and classroom based gesture support for clinical groups.
患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童在口语方面存在困难。然而,一些最新研究表明,这些障碍反映了潜在的认知限制。研究手势可以为我们提供关于语言和认知之间关联的临床和理论信息。共有 20 名 SLI 儿童和 19 名典型发育(TD)同龄人接受了一项新的手势生成测试。儿童还在言语-手势整合任务中接受了句子理解错误的评估。与同龄人相比,SLI 儿童在手势生成方面表现相同,但在理解整合的言语和手势时表现较差。错误模式显示出显著的组间相互作用:SLI 儿童犯了更多基于手势的错误,而 TD 儿童犯了基于语义的错误。尽管 SLI 儿童的口语词汇量受损,但他们仍能获取和生成词汇编码的手势,并且该组手势与语言之间的关联也强于 TD 儿童。当 SLI 理解能力下降时,可能会依赖手势而不是言语,而 TD 儿童则更倾向于使用口语提示。这些发现表明,对于 SLI 儿童来说,手势仍然与语言发展更相关,而对于已经不再依赖手势的 TD 同龄人来说则不然。未来的临床意义可能包括对手势的标准化评估以及为临床群体提供基于课堂的手势支持。