Suppr超能文献

一项关于普通实践中死亡证明的混合方法前瞻性研究。

A mixed-methods prospective study of death certification in general practice.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):351-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq012. Epub 2010 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate completion of death certificates is important for compiling national and regional statistics. Determining actual cause of death can be extremely difficult; internationally, uncertainty has been acknowledged in many cases. We set out to explore the issue of uncertainty further: in what circumstances do GPs feel more or less certain, and how do they feel about this?

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed (i) to focus on death certification issues faced by GPs and their related attitudes, and (ii) to assess GPs' confidence in stated diagnosis and reasons influencing certification.

METHODS

This was a prospective, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study. Participants were 15 GP trainers in Ireland. Two focus groups, held 1 year apart, explored issues surrounding, and attitudes towards, death certification. A one-page questionnaire, completed after the death of every patient for 6 months, recorded patient age and gender, place and certified cause of death, certifier, and level of certainty about cause of death (on a 10-point scale).

RESULTS

There were 168 deaths across the 15 practices during the study period. Overall confidence in certified cause of death was relatively high but varied significantly according to certifier, and place and cause of death. The main issues surrounded the varying level of certainty with diagnosis, concerns regarding the family of the deceased, and the perceived gap in education about death certification, including legal matters.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs appear to feel in an ambivalent or invidious position where death certification is required, a situation that could be addressed in postgraduate training settings.

摘要

背景

准确填写死亡证明对于编制国家和地区统计数据非常重要。确定实际死因可能非常困难;在国际上,许多情况下都承认存在不确定性。我们着手进一步探讨不确定性问题:在什么情况下全科医生感到更有把握或不太有把握,他们对此有何感受?

目的

本研究旨在(i)关注全科医生在死亡证明方面面临的问题及其相关态度,以及(ii)评估全科医生对其诊断的信心以及影响证明的原因。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、横断面、混合方法研究。参与者是爱尔兰的 15 名全科医生培训师。相隔一年举行了两次焦点小组会议,探讨了与死亡证明相关的问题和态度。在研究期间,15 家诊所中的每位患者死亡后,参与者都会填写一份一页的问卷,记录患者的年龄和性别、死亡地点和认证死因、认证者以及对死因的确定性程度(在 10 分制上)。

结果

在研究期间,15 家诊所共发生了 168 例死亡。对认证死因的总体信心相对较高,但根据认证者、地点和死因的不同,差异很大。主要问题围绕着诊断的确定性程度、对死者家属的关注以及对死亡认证教育的差距(包括法律问题)。

结论

全科医生似乎对需要进行死亡认证的情况感到左右为难或尴尬,这种情况可以在研究生培训环境中得到解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验