Beratungszentrum für Hygiene, Freiburg, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2010 May;75(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.01.015. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
The objective of this case-control study was to investigate the source of contamination and risk factors for colonisation and infection during an outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacter cloacae in the University Medical Center Freiburg. A risk factor analysis was performed on 23 patients with ESBL-producing E. cloacae in the medical and surgical departments by comparing them with 46 non-colonised controls, who were matched for ward and length of hospital stay. For these, a risk factor analysis was conducted. Suspected sources for transmission of ESBL were examined and staff received training in infection control measures. The higher risk in colonised patients was attributed to dialysis with mobile units [odds ratio (OR): 4.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-15.234; P=0.04]. Dialysis units were examined, but no contamination was found. Improvement in dialysis procedures, additional staff training and renewed training in standard precautions led to a substantial fall in case numbers. Risk factor analysis showed that colonised patients carried more invasive devices than controls (central venous catheter: OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 0.74-8.45; P=0.14; Foley catheter: 5.08; 0.61-42.23; P=0.13) and were given a greater number of different antibiotics (penicillins: 2.52; 0.71-8.89; P=0.15; fluoroquinolones: 2.37; 0.77-7.28; P=0.13). The differences in mobile dialysis frequency and antibiotic use between cases and controls were relevant, although the latter was not statistically significant. It was possible to contain the high frequency of ESBL colonisation or infection by reinforcing infection control measures and training the staff involved.
本病例对照研究旨在探讨弗赖堡大学医学中心产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)肠杆菌属 cloacae 爆发流行期间的污染来源和定植及感染的危险因素。通过比较医疗和外科部门的 23 例产 ESBL 肠杆菌属 cloacae 患者和 46 例非定植对照患者,对其进行了风险因素分析。对这些患者进行了风险因素分析。对疑似传播 ESBL 的来源进行了检查,并对医护人员进行了感染控制措施的培训。定植患者的风险更高归因于使用移动单位进行透析[比值比(OR):4.00;95%置信区间(CI):1.05-15.234;P=0.04]。检查了透析单元,但未发现污染。改进透析程序、增加员工培训和重新进行标准预防培训导致病例数量大幅下降。风险因素分析显示,定植患者携带的侵入性器械比对照组多(中心静脉导管:OR:2.50;95%CI:0.74-8.45;P=0.14; Foley 导管:5.08;0.61-42.23;P=0.13),使用的抗生素种类也更多(青霉素:2.52;0.71-8.89;P=0.15;氟喹诺酮类:2.37;0.77-7.28;P=0.13)。尽管后者无统计学意义,但移动透析频率和抗生素使用方面的差异与病例和对照组之间的差异相关。通过加强感染控制措施和培训相关员工,有可能控制 ESBL 定植或感染的高频率。