Kaluski Edo, Maher James, Gerula Christine, Tsai Steve, Randhawa Preet, Saric Muhamed, Oghlakian Gerard, Alfano Diane, Palmaro Jack, Haider Bunyad, Klapholz Marc
University Hospital and University of Medicine and Dentistry, Newark, NJ, USA.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.04.108.
To assess the effects of shortened door-to-intervention (DTI) time on appropriate clinical decisions regarding the four most critical and costly decisions during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): cath-lab activation (CLA), use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI), use of PCI, and deployment of drug-eluting stent (DES).
STEMI PCI patients are frequently subject to decision making based on abbreviated medical encounter and limited medical information.
Clinical data were prospectively collected in a STEMI registry over 19 months. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to determine the level of appropriateness of the above-mentioned decisions.
Between June 2006 and December 2007, 200 EKGs with suspected STEMI were transmitted; 88 (44%) resulted in CLA. Compared to prior year, DTI times decreased from 145.7 to 69.9 min (P=.00001). DTI was longer during nights and weekends (87.5 vs. 51.8 min, P=.001) and the initial 6 months of the registry (86.8 vs. 66.8 min, P=.07). Nineteen (21.6%) of the patients undergoing angiography did not require revascularization, 56 (63.6%) received GPIs, and 65 patients (73.8%) underwent at least one vessel PCI, and at least one DES was used in 39 patients (60% of PCI cohort). When assessed for appropriateness, CLA was appropriate in 81.8% of the time and rendered borderline or inappropriate in 5.7% and 12.5%, respectively. GPI use was appropriate in 66% of the patients but seemed borderline or inappropriate in 28.5% and 5.4%, respectively. PCI was appropriate in 90% of the lesions treated, and borderline or inappropriate in 7.1% and 2.9%, respectively. DES use was viewed appropriate in 38.4%, and borderline or inappropriate in 51% and 10.2% of the DES deployments, respectively.
(1) In view of expedited care, certain information required for decision-making process is either not available or ignored during primary PCI. (2) Appropriate use of resources in primary PCI needs to be better defined. (3) Measures of extracting patients' previous medical records and imaging studies along with in-lab immediate blood work and echocardiography and establishing new "time-out" protocols for STEMI patients may improve resource utilization and patient care and outcome.
评估缩短从就诊到干预(DTI)时间对在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间关于四项最关键且成本最高的决策的适当临床决策的影响,这四项决策为导管室激活(CLA)、糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂(GPI)的使用、PCI的使用以及药物洗脱支架(DES)的植入。
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)PCI患者经常基于简短的医疗接触和有限的医疗信息进行决策。
前瞻性收集了一个STEMI登记处19个月的临床数据。进行回顾性病历审查以确定上述决策的适当程度。
在2006年6月至2007年12月期间,传输了200份疑似STEMI的心电图;88份(44%)导致导管室激活。与前一年相比,DTI时间从145.7分钟降至69.9分钟(P = 0.00001)。夜间和周末的DTI时间更长(87.5分钟对51.8分钟,P = 0.001)以及登记处最初的6个月(86.8分钟对66.8分钟,P = 0.07)。接受血管造影的患者中有19例(21.6%)不需要血运重建,56例(63.6%)接受了GPI治疗,65例患者(73.8%)至少进行了一次血管PCI,39例患者(PCI队列的60%)至少使用了一个DES。在评估适当性时,CLA在81.8%的时间是适当的,分别在5.7%和12.5%的时间处于临界或不适当。GPI的使用在66%的患者中是适当的,但分别在28.5%和5.4%的患者中似乎处于临界或不适当。PCI在90%接受治疗的病变中是适当的,分别在7.1%和2.9%的病变中处于临界或不适当。DES的使用在38.4%的DES植入中被认为是适当的,分别在51%和10.2%的DES植入中处于临界或不适当。
(1)鉴于加快治疗,在直接PCI期间,决策过程所需的某些信息要么不可用,要么被忽视。(2)需要更好地界定直接PCI中资源的适当使用。(3)提取患者以前的病历和影像学研究以及实验室即时血液检查和超声心动图的措施,以及为STEMI患者建立新的“暂停”方案,可能会改善资源利用以及患者护理和结局。