Department of Medicine I, Rudolfstiftung Hospital-Vienna, Juchgasse 25, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Diabetologia. 2010 Jul;53(7):1258-69. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1702-3. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
The ADA and the EASD recently published a consensus statement for the medical management of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. The authors advocate initial treatment with metformin monotherapy and lifestyle modification, followed by addition of basal insulin or a sulfonylurea if glycaemic goals are not met (tier 1 recommendations). All other glucose-lowering therapies are relegated to a secondary (tier 2) status and only recommended for selected clinical settings. In our view, this algorithm does not offer physicians and patients the appropriate selection of options to individualise and optimise care with a view to sustained control of blood glucose and reduction both of diabetes complications and cardiovascular risk. This paper critically assesses the basis of the ADA/EASD algorithm and the resulting tiers of treatment options.
美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会最近发布了一份关于 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理的共识声明。作者主张初始治疗采用二甲双胍单药治疗和生活方式改变,如果血糖目标未达到,则加用基础胰岛素或磺脲类药物(1 级推荐)。所有其他降低血糖的治疗方法均降级为二线(2 级),仅在特定临床情况下推荐使用。在我们看来,该算法并没有为医生和患者提供适当的选择,以根据个体情况调整和优化治疗,从而实现持续的血糖控制,降低糖尿病并发症和心血管风险。本文批判性地评估了 ADA/EASD 算法的依据以及由此产生的治疗选择级别。