Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Aug;22(5):812-8. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209991359. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
Delirium is common in the elderly and is associated with high mortality and negative health outcomes. Reduced activity in the cholinergic system has been implicated in the pathogenesis of delirium. Cholinesterase inhibitors, which increase cholinergic activity, may therefore be beneficial in the treatment of delirium.
This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized pilot study of the treatment of delirium with a cholinesterase inhibitor of patients admitted to hospital medical wards. Patients over the age of 65 years were identified as having delirium by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Patients with delirium were randomized to receive rivastigmine 1.5 mg once a day increasing to 1.5 mg twice a day after seven days or an identical placebo (two tablets after seven days).
Fifteen patients entered the trial; eight received rivastigmine and seven received placebo. All of the rivastigmine group, but only three of the placebo group, were negative for delirium on the CAM when they left the study and eventually discharged home. There was no significant difference in the duration of delirium between the two groups (rivastigmine group 6.3 days versus placebo group 9.9 days, p = 0.5, 95% confidence interval -15.6-8.4).
The numbers of patients who screened positive for delirium was very small and as a result the sample size was too small to make any meaningful inferences about treatment of delirium. Despite the small numbers included in the study, there are some indicators that rivastigmine may be safe and effective in treating delirium.
谵妄在老年人中很常见,与高死亡率和负面健康结果有关。胆碱能系统活性降低与谵妄的发病机制有关。因此,增加胆碱能活性的胆碱酯酶抑制剂可能对治疗谵妄有益。
这是一项针对在医院内科病房住院的老年患者使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂治疗谵妄的双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。使用意识模糊评估方法(CAM)识别年龄在 65 岁以上且患有谵妄的患者。将患有谵妄的患者随机分配接受每天 1.5 毫克的利斯的明,7 天后增加至每天 1.5 毫克两次,或接受相同的安慰剂(7 天后两片)。
15 名患者入组试验;8 名接受利斯的明,7 名接受安慰剂。当他们离开研究并最终出院回家时,利斯的明组的所有患者,而安慰剂组只有 3 名患者,CAM 检查结果为谵妄阴性。两组谵妄持续时间无显著差异(利斯的明组 6.3 天与安慰剂组 9.9 天,p = 0.5,95%置信区间-15.6-8.4)。
筛查出患有谵妄的患者人数非常少,因此样本量太小,无法对谵妄的治疗做出任何有意义的推论。尽管研究中纳入的患者人数较少,但有一些迹象表明利斯的明治疗谵妄可能是安全有效的。