Suppr超能文献

就发病率、死亡率和剩余生活质量而言,老年肺癌患者进行手术切除是否合理?

In elderly patients with lung cancer is resection justified in terms of morbidity, mortality and residual quality of life?

作者信息

Chambers Anthony, Routledge Tom, Pilling John, Scarci Marco

机构信息

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, BSMS Teaching Building, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9PX, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;10(6):1015-21. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.233189. Epub 2010 Mar 30.

Abstract

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In [patients over 70 years of age with lung cancer] is [lung resection] when compared with [non-surgical treatment] justified in terms of [postoperative morbidity, mortality and quality of life]? Altogether more than 297 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that patients over 70 years of age undergoing anatomical lung resection respond as well as younger patients in terms of morbidity, mortality and residual quality of life (QoL). Collective analysis of the papers reveals no significant difference in five-year survival rates following surgery for early stage disease (stage I non-small cell lung cancer: <70 years; 69-77%, >70 years; 59-78%), although, elderly patients currently receive far higher rates of palliative care (30-47% in patients 65-70 years vs. 8% in patients under 65 years). Additionally, 30-day mortality rates (5.7% <70 years vs. 1.3-3.3% >70 years), length of hospital stay [1.3 days vs. 1 day (video-assisted mini-thoracotomy) and 4.6 vs. 4.9-5.2 days (thoracotomy) for <70 years vs. >70 years, respectively] and postoperative lung function tests (FEV(1) decrease; 13% <70 years vs. 18% >70 years P=0.34, functional vital capacity decrease; 9% <70 years vs. 14% >70 years P=0.31) are equivalent between the two age groups. Residual QoL following lobectomy (evaluated by patient self-assessment) showed decreased social (P<0.001) and role (P<0.001) functioning but less pain at discharge (P<0.001) in those over 70 years. Global QoL, however, was not influenced by age (global QoL; <70 years 22.2+/-25.3 vs. >70 years 17.6+/-22.9). Pneumonectomy showed statistically significant decreases in physical functioning [six months postoperatively (MPO) P=0.045], role functioning (3 MPO P=0.035), social functioning (6 MPO P=0.006, 12 MPO P=0.001) and general pain (6 MPO P=0.037), but showed no age related differences (<70 years; 81.9+/-19.1, >70 years; 78.0+/-22.8).

摘要

一篇胸外科最佳证据主题文章是按照结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是:在[70岁以上肺癌患者]中,相较于[非手术治疗],[肺切除术]在[术后发病率、死亡率和生活质量]方面是否合理?通过报告的检索方式共找到297余篇论文,其中12篇构成回答该临床问题的最佳证据。这些论文的作者、期刊、发表日期和国家、所研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局及结果均列于表格中。我们得出结论,70岁以上接受肺叶切除术的患者在发病率、死亡率和剩余生活质量(QoL)方面与年轻患者表现相当。对这些论文的综合分析显示,早期疾病(I期非小细胞肺癌:<70岁患者五年生存率为69 - 77%,>70岁患者为59 - 78%)手术后五年生存率无显著差异,不过,老年患者目前接受姑息治疗的比例要高得多(65 - 70岁患者为30 - 47%,<65岁患者为8%)。此外,30天死亡率(<70岁患者为5.7%,>70岁患者为1.3 - 3.3%)、住院时间(<70岁患者分别为1.3天与1天(电视辅助小切口开胸手术)以及4.6天与4.9 - 5.2天(开胸手术),>70岁患者分别为1天与1天(电视辅助小切口开胸手术)以及4.9 - 5.2天与4.6天(开胸手术))和术后肺功能测试(第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV(1))下降:<70岁患者为13%,>70岁患者为18%,P = 0.34;功能肺活量下降:<70岁患者为9%,>70岁患者为14%,P = 0.31)在两个年龄组之间相当。肺叶切除术后的剩余生活质量(通过患者自我评估)显示,70岁以上患者的社交功能(P < 0.001)和角色功能(P < 0.001)下降,但出院时疼痛较轻(P < 0.001)。然而,总体生活质量不受年龄影响(总体生活质量:<70岁患者为22.2 ± 25.3,>70岁患者为17.6 ± 22.9)。全肺切除术后在身体功能(术后六个月(MPO)P = 0.045)、角色功能(术后三个月(MPO)P = 0.035)、社交功能(术后六个月(MPO)P = 0.006,术后十二个月(MPO)P = 0.001)和总体疼痛(术后六个月(MPO)P = 0.037)方面有统计学显著下降,但未显示出年龄相关差异(<70岁患者为81.9 ± 19.1,>70岁患者为78.0 ± 22.8)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验