Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA.
Med Care. 2010 Apr;48(4):288-95. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181cafbe3.
Though demand for mental health services (MHS) among US veterans is increasing, MHS utilization per veteran is decreasing. With health and social service needs competing for limited resources, it is important to understand the association between patient factors, MHS utilization, and clinical outcomes.
We use a framework based on Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization to examine predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and clinical need as predictors of MHS utilization and clinical outcomes.
This was a prospective observational study of veterans receiving inpatient or outpatient MHS through Veterans Administration programs. Clinician ratings (Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF]) and self-report assessments (Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24) were completed for 421 veterans at enrollment and 3 months later. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine: (1) predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and need as predictors of MHS inpatient, residential, and outpatient utilization and (2) the association between individual characteristics, utilization, and clinical outcomes.
Being older, female, having greater clinical need, lack of enabling resources (employment, stable housing, and social support), and easy access to treatment significantly predicted greater MHS utilization at 3-month follow-up. Less clinical need and no inpatient psychiatric hospitalization predicted better GAF and Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24 scores. White race and residential treatment also predicted better GAF scores. Neither enabling resources, nor number of outpatient mental health visits predicted clinical outcomes.
This application of Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization confirmed associations between some predisposing characteristics, need, and enabling resources on MHS utilization but only predisposing characteristics, need, and utilization were associated with clinical outcomes.
尽管美国退伍军人对心理健康服务(MHS)的需求正在增加,但每位退伍军人对 MHS 的利用率却在下降。由于健康和社会服务需求与有限资源竞争,因此了解患者因素、MHS 利用率和临床结果之间的关联非常重要。
我们使用基于安德森健康服务利用行为模型的框架,研究易感性特征、使能资源和临床需求作为 MHS 利用和临床结果的预测因素。
这是一项对通过退伍军人事务部计划接受住院或门诊 MHS 的退伍军人进行的前瞻性观察性研究。在入组时和 3 个月后,为 421 名退伍军人完成了临床医生评分(总体评估功能[GAF])和自我报告评估(行为和症状识别量表-24)。进行线性和逻辑回归分析,以检验:(1)易感性特征、使能资源和需求对 MHS 住院、住院和门诊利用的预测作用;(2)个体特征、利用与临床结果之间的关联。
年龄较大、女性、临床需求较高、缺乏使能资源(就业、稳定住房和社会支持)以及治疗方便显著预测了 3 个月随访时 MHS 利用率更高。临床需求较低且没有住院精神病院治疗预测 GAF 和行为和症状识别量表-24 评分更好。白人种族和住院治疗也预测了更好的 GAF 评分。使能资源和门诊心理健康就诊次数均未预测临床结果。
安德森健康服务利用行为模型的这种应用证实了某些易感性特征、需求和使能资源与 MHS 利用率之间的关联,但只有易感性特征、需求和利用率与临床结果相关。