Suppr超能文献

连续患者系列中单独使用真空辅助闭合治疗早期(<30 天)血管腹股沟感染而不覆盖肌瓣的处理。

Management of early (<30 day) vascular groin infections using vacuum-assisted closure alone without muscle flap coverage in a consecutive patient series.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5):1160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.053. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy without muscle flap coverage is our primary approach for graft preservation in early, deep groin infections with and without exposed grafts; however, concerns exist regarding its safety. We report our experience in a consecutive series of patients with early groin infections managed without muscle flap closure.

METHODS

All patients with early (<30 day), deep vascular groin infections without (Szilagyi II) or with (Szilagyi III) exposed vascular graft or suture line between January 2004 and December 2008 were reviewed. Graft preservation followed by local wound care with VAC was attempted in all with intact anastomoses, patent grafts, and absence of systemic sepsis. Szilagyi classification, microorganism cultured, duration of VAC use, time to healing, additional interventions, and follow-up data (limb salvage, survival) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (26 groins, mean age 69.1 +/- 9.5 years [range, 44-86 years]) presented with deep groin infections 16 +/- 5 days (range, 7-28 days) after the index procedure (bypass-polytetrafluoroethylene [n = 11], autologous vein [n = 3], endarterectomy/patch [n = 6], extra-anatomic bypass [n = 5], percutaneous closure device [n = 1]). Grafts were exposed in 12 groins (Szilagyi III, nine with suture lines). VAC was started one to six days (median, three) after operative debridement. All had positive wound cultures and received culture-directed antibiotic therapy for 47 +/- 45 days (range, 14-180 days). Length of stay was significantly more in Szilagyi III, whereas mean VAC use and time-to-healing were similar. Mean follow-up was 33.4 +/- 19.5 months (range, 2-72 months). All wounds healed (mean, 49 +/- 21 days). Two treatment failures occurred in the Szilagyi III group (17%). One patient had bleeding from the anastomotic heel eight days after debridement, had graft removal/in situ replacement and one presented with reinfection on day 117 and had partial graft removal/extra-anatomic bypass. There was no perioperative mortality or limb loss, but six late unrelated mortalities and one amputation at 46 months unrelated to the groin infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of early, deep groin wound infections with debridement, antibiotics, and VAC treatment is safe and enables graft preservation in the majority of patients with minimal morbidity, no perioperative limb loss, or mortality.

摘要

目的

在伴有或不伴有移植血管外露的早期、深部腹股沟感染中,我们主要采用真空辅助闭合(VAC)治疗而不使用肌肉瓣覆盖,以保留移植物;然而,人们对其安全性存在担忧。我们报告了在一组连续的早期(<30 天)、深部血管腹股沟感染患者中,不使用肌肉瓣闭合的经验,这些患者均接受了 VAC 局部伤口护理。

方法

对 2004 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间接受治疗的所有早期(<30 天)、深部血管腹股沟感染(Szilagyi II 期)或伴有(Szilagyi III 期)血管移植物外露或缝线的患者进行回顾性分析。所有吻合口完整、移植血管通畅且无全身败血症的患者均尝试保留移植物,随后进行局部伤口护理,使用 VAC。对 Szilagyi 分类、培养的微生物、VAC 使用时间、愈合时间、其他干预措施和随访数据(肢体保存、存活)进行分析。

结果

22 例(26 侧腹股沟,平均年龄 69.1 ± 9.5 岁[范围 44-86 岁])在指数手术后 16 ± 5 天(范围 7-28 天)出现深部腹股沟感染(旁路-聚四氟乙烯[11 例]、自体静脉[3 例]、内膜切除术/修补[6 例]、外解剖旁路[5 例]、经皮闭合装置[1 例])。12 侧腹股沟的移植物外露(Szilagyi III 期,9 例伴有缝线)。VAC 在术后清创后 1-6 天(中位数 3 天)开始使用。所有患者的伤口均有阳性培养物,接受了 47 ± 45 天(范围 14-180 天)的培养导向抗生素治疗。Szilagyi III 期患者的住院时间明显更长,而 VAC 使用时间和愈合时间相似。平均随访时间为 33.4 ± 19.5 个月(范围 2-72 个月)。所有伤口均愈合(平均愈合时间为 49 ± 21 天)。Szilagyi III 期有 2 例治疗失败(17%)。1 例患者在清创后 8 天出现吻合口足跟出血,行移植物取出/原位置换,1 例患者在第 117 天出现再感染,行部分移植物切除/外解剖旁路。无围手术期死亡或肢体丧失,但有 6 例晚期与腹股沟感染无关的死亡和 1 例 46 个月时与腹股沟感染无关的截肢。

结论

在伴有或不伴有移植血管外露的早期、深部腹股沟感染患者中,采用清创术、抗生素和 VAC 治疗是安全的,能够保留大多数患者的移植物,只有最小的发病率,无围手术期肢体丧失或死亡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验