• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架相比,雷帕霉素洗脱 Yukon-choice 支架冠状动脉植入 12 个月后再狭窄率增加。

Increased restenosis rates 12 months after coronary implantation of the sirolimus-eluting YUKON-choice stent compared to the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Stent.

机构信息

Red Cross Hospital Cardiology Center, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2010 Apr;33(4):E33-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20483.

DOI:10.1002/clc.20483
PMID:20358534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6653429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previously the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting YUKON-Choice stent (A) has demonstrated noninferiority compared to the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent (B). To test for long-term equivalency in unselected real-world coronary lesions of various complexities, we retrospectively compared both stents.

METHODS

A total of 410 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) were treated with stent A (n = 205) or stent B (n = 205). Baseline clinical characteristics, lesion location, and length and the number of stents implanted per lesion were equally distributed. Clinical follow-up with assessment of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and noncardiac deaths was obtained at 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Nominal stent diameter and nominal length of the stented segment were without differences between the groups. The incidence of MACE after 12 months was significantly higher in group A (35.1%) compared to group B (16.6%, P = .001). This was mainly due to increased rates of target-lesion revascularizations in group A (13.7%) vs group B (4.4%, P = .005). No significant differences in target-vessel revascularizations and non-target-vessel revascularizations were observed. In group B, 1 stent thrombosis was documented (0.5%) vs none in group A (P > .05); in each group 1 myocardial infarction (MI), but no cardiac deaths occurred; 3 noncardiac deaths in group A (1.5%) vs 7 in group B (3.4%) were observed (P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to our previous findings indicating no differences in MACE between patients treated with the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting YUKON-Choice stent and the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent at 6 months, we herewith show that 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of real-world coronary lesions the YUKON stent appears to be inferior due to increased target-lesion revascularization (TLR) rates as a consequence of delayed restenosis.

摘要

背景

先前的无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱 Yukon-Choice 支架(A)与基于聚合物的紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架(B)相比,已被证明非劣效性。为了在各种复杂程度的未经选择的真实冠状动脉病变中测试长期等效性,我们回顾性地比较了这两种支架。

方法

共有 410 例有症状的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者接受支架 A(n=205)或支架 B(n=205)治疗。基线临床特征、病变位置、植入每个病变的支架数量和长度均均匀分布。在 9 和 12 个月时获得了主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和非心脏死亡的临床随访评估。

结果

两组支架的名义支架直径和支架段的名义长度无差异。A 组 12 个月时 MACE 的发生率明显高于 B 组(35.1%比 16.6%,P=0.001)。这主要是由于 A 组(13.7%)的靶病变血运重建率高于 B 组(4.4%,P=0.005)。两组之间的靶血管血运重建和非靶血管血运重建率无显著差异。B 组发生 1 例支架血栓形成(0.5%),而 A 组无(P>0.05);两组各发生 1 例心肌梗死(MI),但无心脏死亡;A 组发生 3 例非心脏死亡(1.5%),B 组发生 7 例(3.4%)(P=0.3)。

结论

与我们之前的研究结果相反,即与聚合物洗脱紫杉醇 Taxus 支架相比,6 个月时接受无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱 Yukon-Choice 支架治疗的患者在 MACE 方面没有差异,我们发现,在真实冠状动脉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后 12 个月,Yukon 支架由于延迟再狭窄导致靶病变血运重建(TLR)率增加,因此效果较差。

相似文献

1
Increased restenosis rates 12 months after coronary implantation of the sirolimus-eluting YUKON-choice stent compared to the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Stent.与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架相比,雷帕霉素洗脱 Yukon-choice 支架冠状动脉植入 12 个月后再狭窄率增加。
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Apr;33(4):E33-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20483.
2
Comparison of a polymer-free rapamycin-eluting stent (YUKON) with a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS) in real-world coronary artery lesions.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):333-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21326.
3
Randomized comparison of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the LIPSIA Yukon trial.随机比较无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与聚合物紫杉醇洗脱支架在糖尿病患者中的应用:LIPSIA Yukon 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr;4(4):452-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.016.
4
Five-year clinical follow-up of a randomized comparison of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus (LIPSIA Yukon trial).糖尿病患者中无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与聚合物载紫杉醇洗脱支架随机比较的 5 年临床随访(LIPSIA Yukon 试验)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb 15;83(3):418-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25131. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
5
Five-year clinical outcomes of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a permanent polymer paclitaxel-eluting stent: final results of the intracoronary stenting and angiographic restenosis - test equivalence between two drug-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST) trial.无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与永久性聚合物紫杉醇洗脱支架 5 年临床结果:冠状动脉支架置入术和血管造影再狭窄 - 两种药物洗脱支架(ISAR-TEST)试验等效性的最终结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):E23-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24375. Epub 2012 May 4.
6
[Effects of sirolimus-eluting stent and the paclitaxel-eluting stent: a three-year follow-up study].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 8;88(26):1811-4.
7
Comparison of the slow-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting Taxus-Express stent with the bare-metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions.基于缓释聚合物的紫杉醇洗脱TAXUS Express支架与裸金属Express支架用于隐静脉移植血管介入治疗的比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Feb;96(2):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0460-1. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
8
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后病变长度和血管大小对临床结局的影响:来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统 XIENCE V 的临床评估)和 COMPARE(真实世界中第二代依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架)随机试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.
9
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting versus polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents: an individual patient data analysis of randomized trials.无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与含聚合物紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较:随机试验的个体患者数据分析
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Jun;66(6):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2012.11.016. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Microporous Stent in Real-World Practice: Final Results of the Safety and Efficacy Registry of the Yinyi Stent (SERY-I).无聚合物紫杉醇洗脱微孔支架在实际临床应用中的三年临床结果:银翼支架(SERY-I)安全性和有效性注册研究的最终结果
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017 Jan;33(1):28-33. doi: 10.6515/acs20160131b.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of a polymer-free rapamycin-eluting stent (YUKON) with a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS) in real-world coronary artery lesions.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):333-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21326.
2
A meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.一项针对冠心病患者中雷帕霉素洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的16项随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.047. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
3
Does addition of estradiol improve the efficacy of a rapamycin-eluting stent? Results of the ISAR-PEACE randomized trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 27;49(12):1265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.021.
4
Are drug-eluting stents associated with a higher rate of late thrombosis than bare metal stents? Late stent thrombosis: a nuisance in both bare metal and drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架与晚期血栓形成率高于裸金属支架有关吗?晚期支架血栓形成:裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架中都存在的一个麻烦问题。
Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1433-9; discussion 1439. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666826. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
5
Unanswered questions--drug-eluting stents and the risk of late thrombosis.未解决的问题——药物洗脱支架与晚期血栓形成风险
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):981-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068305. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
6
A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.一项比较西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架的汇总数据分析。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):989-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066633. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
7
Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱冠状动脉支架的安全性与有效性
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):998-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067193. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
8
Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.对14项比较西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架的试验进行分析。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1030-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067484. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
9
Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.瑞典药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的长期疗效对比
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1009-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067722. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
10
Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.比较药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的随机对照试验中的死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2006 Dec;27(23):2784-814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl282. Epub 2006 Oct 4.