Ambrosini Daniel L, Crocker Anne G
Département de Psychiatrie, Université McGill, Quebec, Canada.
Sante Ment Que. 2009 Autumn;34(2):51-74. doi: 10.7202/039126ar.
Although psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are grounded in the ethics of autonomy, the relationship between the two is unclear. PADs are legal documents that allow individuals with mental illness to record their treatment preferences should they become incompetent in the future. The relationship between autonomy and PADs has been discussed in ethical, legal, and philosophical terms, but has not been clearly operationalized for clinical purposes. Autonomy is a fundamental ethical value that includes having the independence from outside controlling influences and the mental capacity to direct one's personal actions. Individuals with mental illness sometimes require assistance to understand their ethical and legal rights with respect to autonomous choice, and professional stakeholders need education regarding the importance of autonomy for clinical practice. Competency to consent to treatment is the mental prerequisite that ensures individuals with mental illness are able to complete PADs with insight, whereas autonomy is the value that empowers individuals to work towards their recovery.
尽管精神科预先指示(PADs)基于自主伦理,但二者之间的关系尚不明晰。PADs是法律文件,允许患有精神疾病的个人记录其在未来丧失行为能力时的治疗偏好。自主与PADs之间的关系已从伦理、法律和哲学角度进行了讨论,但尚未为临床目的明确实施。自主是一项基本伦理价值,包括不受外部控制影响的独立性以及指导个人行为的心智能力。患有精神疾病的个体有时需要协助来理解其在自主选择方面的伦理和法律权利,而专业利益相关者需要接受关于自主对临床实践重要性的教育。同意治疗的能力是确保患有精神疾病的个体能够明智地完成PADs的心智前提,而自主是使个体朝着康复努力的价值。