Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham Research Park, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2SQ, United Kingdom.
Injury. 2011 May;42(5):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
Exsanguination from penetrating torso injury is a major source of mortality on the battlefield. Advanced Life Support guidelines suggest 'on-scene' thoracotomy for patients in cardiac arrest following penetrating chest trauma. This requires significant resourcing and training. Experience from published series (31 pre-hospital thoracotomies with 3 survivors) suggests that when this manoeuvre is applied to a well selected group it is a significant and life-saving procedure. Can this be applied to military injuries?
Over a 12 month period on Operation Herrick all patients who sustained significant thoracic trauma were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters were recorded to allow detailed analysis of injury pattern and operative management. Our main objective was to determine if an early (pre-hospital) thoracotomy would have influenced the outcome.
Over the period, 81 patients required operative intervention following thoracic trauma: 8 patients underwent emergency thoracotomy (performed as part of the resuscitation) and 14 underwent urgent thoracotomy (performed after physiology partly restored). There were 9 fatalities--7 undergoing emergency thoracotomy and 2 post-operatively from multi-organ failure. Of the 7 intra-operative deaths 4/7 patients had thoracic injury and 6/7 had additional abdominal injuries. The median predicted survival of fatalities was 2.0% using Trauma Injury Severity Scoring.
Emergency thoracotomy should be performed in cardiac arrest following penetrating trauma as soon as possible. Highest survival rates in both in-hospital and pre-hospital thoracotomy are found in isolated cardiac stab wounds (19.4%). Poorest survival is found in multiply, ballistic injured patients (0.7%). The latter best reflects the injury pattern of military patients who have cardiac arrest following penetrating torso injury.
As our injury pattern suggests, any pre-hospital thoracotomy on military patients is likely to require complex intervention in very challenging environments. Our evidence does not support the notion that earlier thoracotomy could improve survival.
穿透性躯干损伤导致的失血是战场上死亡的主要原因。高级生命支持指南建议对穿透性胸部创伤后心脏骤停的患者进行“现场”开胸术。这需要大量的资源和培训。来自已发表系列的经验(31 例院前开胸术,3 例存活)表明,当将此操作应用于精选的患者群体时,它是一种重要且救生的程序。这种方法是否可以应用于军事伤害?
在赫尔里克行动期间的 12 个月期间,回顾性地审查了所有遭受严重胸部创伤的患者。记录参数以允许对损伤模式和手术管理进行详细分析。我们的主要目的是确定早期(院前)开胸术是否会影响结果。
在此期间,81 名患者因胸部创伤需要手术干预:8 名患者接受了紧急开胸术(作为复苏的一部分进行),14 名患者接受了紧急开胸术(在生理部分恢复后进行)。有 9 人死亡 - 7 人接受紧急开胸术,2 人术后死于多器官衰竭。在 7 例术中死亡中,4/7 例患者有胸部损伤,6/7 例患者有额外的腹部损伤。使用创伤损伤严重程度评分,致命伤的中位预测存活率为 2.0%。
穿透性创伤后心脏骤停应尽快进行紧急开胸术。在院内和院前开胸术中,孤立性心脏刺伤的生存率最高(19.4%)。多发、弹道损伤患者的生存率最低(0.7%)。后者最能反映穿透性躯干损伤后心脏骤停的军事患者的损伤模式。
正如我们的损伤模式所表明的那样,对军事患者进行任何院前开胸术都可能需要在非常具有挑战性的环境中进行复杂的干预。我们的证据不支持更早开胸术可以提高生存率的观点。