Neurology Clinical Trials Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Lancet Neurol. 2010 May;9(5):481-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70068-5. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
In a pilot study, lithium treatment slowed progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We aimed to confirm or disprove these findings by assessing the safety and efficacy of lithium in combination with riluzole in patients with ALS.
We did a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a time-to-event design. Between January and June, 2009, patients with ALS who were taking a stable dose of riluzole for at least 30 days were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised computer to receive either lithium or placebo. Patients, caregivers, investigators, and all site study staff with the exception of site pharmacists were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the time to an event, defined as a decrease of at least six points on the revised ALS functional rating scale score or death. Interim analyses were planned for when 84 patients had been allocated treatment, 6 months later or after 55 events, and after 100 events. Analysis was by intention to treat. The stopping boundary for futility at the first interim analysis was a p value of at least 0.68. We used a log-rank test to compare the distributions of the time to an event between the lithium and placebo groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00818389.
At the first interim analysis, 22 of 40 patients in the lithium group had an event compared with 20 of 44 patients in the placebo group (log rank p=0.51). The hazard ratio of reaching the primary endpoint was 1.13 (95% CI 0.61-2.07). The study was stopped at the first interim analysis because criterion for futility was met (p=0.78). The difference in mean decline in the ALS functional rating scale score between the lithium group and the placebo group was 0.15 (95% CI -0.43 to 0.73, p=0.61). There were no major safety concerns. Falls (p=0.04) and back pain (p=0.05) were more common in the lithium group than in the placebo group.
We found no evidence that lithium in combination with riluzole slows progression of ALS more than riluzole alone. The time-to-event endpoint and use of prespecified interim analyses enabled a clear result to be obtained rapidly. This design should be considered for future trials testing the therapeutic efficacy of drugs that are easily accessible to people with ALS.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, ALS Association, and ALS Society of Canada.
在一项初步研究中,锂治疗可减缓肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的进展。我们旨在通过评估锂联合利鲁唑治疗 ALS 患者的安全性和疗效来证实或反驳这些发现。
我们进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、时间事件设计的试验。2009 年 1 月至 6 月,接受利鲁唑稳定剂量治疗至少 30 天的 ALS 患者通过中央计算机以 1:1 的比例随机分配(随机分组)接受锂或安慰剂治疗。患者、护理人员、研究者以及除站点药剂师以外的所有站点研究人员对治疗分配均设盲。主要终点是事件发生的时间,定义为修订后的 ALS 功能评定量表评分至少下降 6 分或死亡。当 84 例患者接受治疗、6 个月后或 55 例事件后、100 例事件后,计划进行中期分析。分析采用意向治疗。第一次中期分析的无效性终止边界为 p 值至少为 0.68。我们使用对数秩检验比较锂组和安慰剂组之间事件发生时间的分布。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT00818389。
在第一次中期分析中,锂组 40 例患者中有 22 例发生事件,安慰剂组 44 例患者中有 20 例发生事件(对数秩检验 p=0.51)。达到主要终点的风险比为 1.13(95%CI 0.61-2.07)。由于满足无效性标准(p=0.78),研究在第一次中期分析时停止。锂组和安慰剂组之间 ALS 功能评定量表评分的平均下降差异为 0.15(95%CI-0.43 至 0.73,p=0.61)。没有重大安全问题。锂组比安慰剂组更常见跌倒(p=0.04)和背痛(p=0.05)。
我们没有发现锂联合利鲁唑比单独使用利鲁唑更能减缓 ALS 的进展。时间事件终点和使用预设的中期分析能够快速得出明确的结果。对于测试易于 ALS 患者获得的药物治疗疗效的未来试验,应考虑这种设计。
美国国立神经病学和卒中研究所、肌萎缩侧索硬化症协会和加拿大肌萎缩侧索硬化症协会。