Multidisciplinary Hospital for Active Treatment Queen Giovanna Ltd., Sofia, Bulgaria.
Adv Ther. 2010 Feb;27(2):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0012-y. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
The primary objective of the trial was to prove the therapeutic equivalence of epoetin zeta to epoetin alfa when administered subcutaneously for maintaining target hemoglobin (Hb) in patients with renal anemia on chronic hemodialysis. Additional information was provided on the safety and tolerability of epoetin zeta with particular focus on the formation of anti-erythropoietin antibodies.
A total of 462 patients were randomized to either epoetin zeta or alfa for 28 weeks after an open period of dose adjustment of 12-16 weeks with only epoetin zeta. The aim of treatment was to maintain Hb between 10.0-12.0 g/dL with constant epoetin dosage. Primary endpoints were the mean Hb level and the mean weekly epoetin dosage during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of anti-erythropoietin antibodies, incidence of Hb levels above 13 g/dL, ratings of tolerability, and adverse events (AEs).
The mean Hb level (+/-SD) during the last 4 weeks of treatment was 10.94+/-0.84 g/dL (epoetin zeta) and 11.02+/-0.94 g/dL (epoetin alfa). The 95% confidence interval (CI) (''C0.28 g/dL to 0.12 g/dL) was entirely within the predefined equivalence range (+/-0.5 g/dL). The mean weekly epoetin dosage per body weight over the last 4 weeks of treatment was 97.0+/-94.3 IU/kg/week (epoetin zeta) and 86.0+/-78.0 IU/kg/week (epoetin alfa). The 95% CI (''C8.06 IU/kg/week to 29.96 IU/kg/week) was also within the predefined equivalence range of +/-45 IU/kg/week. The most common AEs were infections and infestations (15.1% of patients on epoetin zeta and 14.8% of patients on epoetin alfa). None of the patients developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies.
Epoetin zeta, administered subcutaneously, is equivalent to epoetin alfa in respect of its clinical efficacy. The safety profile of both products is similar: no unexpected AEs were observed, no patients developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies, and both epoetin preparations were well tolerated.
本试验的主要目的是证明在接受慢性血液透析的肾性贫血患者中,皮下给予促红细胞生成素 ζ 与促红细胞生成素 α 维持目标血红蛋白(Hb)时的治疗等效性。特别关注抗促红细胞生成素抗体的形成,同时提供了促红细胞生成素 ζ 的安全性和耐受性信息。
462 名患者在接受为期 12-16 周的开放剂量调整期后,随机分为促红细胞生成素 ζ 或 α 组,接受为期 28 周的治疗。治疗的目的是使 Hb 维持在 10.0-12.0 g/dL,且促红细胞生成素剂量保持不变。主要终点是治疗最后 4 周的平均 Hb 水平和每周平均促红细胞生成素剂量。安全性终点是抗促红细胞生成素抗体的发生、Hb 水平超过 13 g/dL 的发生率、耐受性评分和不良事件(AE)。
治疗最后 4 周的平均 Hb 水平(+/-SD)分别为 10.94+/-0.84 g/dL(促红细胞生成素 ζ)和 11.02+/-0.94 g/dL(促红细胞生成素 α)。95%置信区间(CI)(“C0.28 g/dL 至 0.12 g/dL)完全在预设的等效范围(+/-0.5 g/dL)内。治疗最后 4 周每周每公斤体重的平均促红细胞生成素剂量分别为 97.0+/-94.3 IU/kg/week(促红细胞生成素 ζ)和 86.0+/-78.0 IU/kg/week(促红细胞生成素 α)。95%CI(“C8.06 IU/kg/week 至 29.96 IU/kg/week)也在 +/-45 IU/kg/week 的预设等效范围内。最常见的 AE 是感染和寄生虫感染(促红细胞生成素 ζ 组 15.1%的患者和促红细胞生成素 α 组 14.8%的患者)。没有患者发生抗促红细胞生成素抗体。
皮下给予促红细胞生成素 ζ 在临床疗效方面与促红细胞生成素 α 相当。两种产品的安全性特征相似:未观察到意外 AE,没有患者发生抗促红细胞生成素抗体,两种促红细胞生成素制剂均具有良好的耐受性。