Jakubczyk Michał, Wrona Witold, Macioch Tomasz, Golicki Dominik, Niewada Maciej, Hermanowski Tomasz
Zakład Farmakoekonomiki, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny.
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010 Jan;28(163):42-5.
In the health technology assessment it is crucial to define the perspective of the analysis. When the societal perspective is chosen it is necessary to include all the costs incurred by the society, also the costs of lost productivity resulting from absence of sick employees from work or their reduced efficiency at work. The aim of this article is to present the notion of indirect costs, their importance in health technology assessment and the methods of calculation. The economic literature has been reviewed for the state of knowledge on indirect costs. Three methods of calculation are described: human capital method, friction cost method or health state valuation. Indirect costs in Western European countries can amount to more than half of total costs attributed to the illness and its treatment. In the literature there is no consensus regarding the proper method of indirect costs calculation. It is necessary to conduct further theoretical and empirical research in the area of indirect costs and enhance discussion among Polish pharmacoeconomists.
在卫生技术评估中,确定分析的视角至关重要。当选择社会视角时,有必要纳入社会所承担的所有成本,还包括因患病员工缺勤或工作效率降低而导致的生产力损失成本。本文旨在介绍间接成本的概念、其在卫生技术评估中的重要性以及计算方法。对经济文献中关于间接成本的知识状况进行了综述。描述了三种计算方法:人力资本法、摩擦成本法或健康状态估值法。在西欧国家,间接成本可能占到疾病及其治疗总成本的一半以上。关于间接成本的正确计算方法,文献中尚无共识。有必要在间接成本领域开展进一步的理论和实证研究,并加强波兰药物经济学家之间的讨论。