• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电容传声器的辐射阻抗及其扩散场响应。

Radiation impedance of condenser microphones and their diffuse-field responses.

机构信息

Danish Fundamental Metrology, Danish Primary Laboratory of Acoustics, Matematiktorvet 307, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2290-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3353093.

DOI:10.1121/1.3353093
PMID:20370010
Abstract

The relation between the diffuse-field response and the radiation impedance of a microphone has been investigated. Such a relation can be derived from classical theory. The practical measurement of the radiation impedance requires (a) measuring the volume velocity of the membrane of the microphone and (b) measuring the pressure on the membrane of the microphone. The first measurement is carried out by means of laser vibrometry. The second measurement cannot be implemented in practice. However, the pressure on the membrane can be calculated numerically by means of the boundary element method. In this way, a hybrid estimate of the radiation impedance is obtained. The resulting estimate of the diffuse-field response is compared with experimental estimates of the diffuse-field response determined using reciprocity and the random-incidence method. The different estimates are in good agreement at frequencies below the resonance frequency of the microphone. Although the method may not be of great practical utility, it provides a useful validation of the estimates obtained by other means.

摘要

研究了传声器的扩散场响应与辐射阻抗之间的关系。这种关系可以从经典理论中推导出。辐射阻抗的实际测量需要(a)测量传声器膜片的体积速度,以及(b)测量传声器膜片上的压力。第一项测量是通过激光测振仪进行的。第二项测量在实践中无法实现。然而,通过边界元法可以对膜片上的压力进行数值计算。通过这种方式,可以获得辐射阻抗的混合估计值。得到的扩散场响应的估计值与使用互易法和随机入射法确定的扩散场响应的实验估计值进行了比较。在低于传声器共振频率的频率下,不同的估计值吻合得很好。尽管该方法可能没有很大的实际用途,但它为通过其他方法获得的估计值提供了有用的验证。

相似文献

1
Radiation impedance of condenser microphones and their diffuse-field responses.电容传声器的辐射阻抗及其扩散场响应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2290-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3353093.
2
A note on determination of the diffuse-field sensitivity of microphones using the reciprocity technique.关于使用互易技术确定传声器扩散场灵敏度的说明。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1505-12. doi: 10.1121/1.2950089.
3
Pulse mode of operation of a spherical piezoceramic transducer filled with liquid and having a correcting electric circuit.充液球形压电换能器的脉冲工作模式及其校正电路。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Dec;128(6):3489-95. doi: 10.1121/1.3500691.
4
Hybrid method for determining the parameters of condenser microphones from measured membrane velocities and numerical calculations.基于测量的振膜速度和数值计算确定电容式传声器参数的混合方法。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Oct;126(4):1788-95. doi: 10.1121/1.3203939.
5
Influence of an oscillating circuit on the radiation of transient acoustic waves by an electroelastic cylinder.振荡电路对电弹性圆柱暂态声波辐射的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2282-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3291035.
6
Experimental modeling and design optimization of push-pull electret loudspeakers.推挽式驻极体扬声器的实验建模与设计优化。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2274-81. doi: 10.1121/1.3337224.
7
Dynamic behavior of the circular membrane of an electrostatic microphone: effect of holes in the backing electrode.静电传声器圆膜的动态行为:背电极孔的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Dec;128(6):3459-77. doi: 10.1121/1.3504706.
8
Acoustic centering of sources measured by surrounding spherical microphone arrays.用环绕球形麦克风阵列测量声源的声聚焦。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2003-15. doi: 10.1121/1.3624825.
9
Design and performance evaluation of a broadband three dimensional acoustic intensity measuring system.宽带三维声强测量系统的设计与性能评估。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2338-46. doi: 10.1121/1.3327508.
10
Method for measuring violin sound radiation based on bowed glissandi and its application to sound synthesis.基于弓滑音的小提琴声辐射测量方法及其在声音合成中的应用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug;130(2):1020-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3605291.