Suppr超能文献

成人急诊患者镰状细胞疼痛危象:改善镇痛管理的学习协作模式。

Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: a learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, the Institute for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00693.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to report the baseline (prior to quality improvement interventions) patient and visit characteristics and analgesic management practices for each site participating in an emergency department (ED) sickle cell learning collaborative.

METHODS

A prospective, multisite longitudinal cohort study in the context of a learning-collaborative model was performed in three midwestern EDs. Each site formed a multidisciplinary team charged with improving analgesic management for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Each team developed a nurse-initiated analgesic protocol for SCD patients (implemented after a baseline data collection period of 3.5 months at one site and 10 months at the other two sites). All sites prospectively enrolled adults with an acute pain crisis and SCD. All medical records for patients meeting study criteria were reviewed. Demographic, health services, and analgesic management data were abstracted, including ED visit frequency data, ED disposition, arrival and discharge pain score, and name and route of initial analgesic administered. Ten interviews per quarter per site were conducted with patients within 14 days of their ED discharge, and subjects were queried about the highest level of pain acceptable at discharge. The primary outcome variable was the time to initial analgesic administration. Variable data were described as means and standard deviations (SDs) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for nonnormal data.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients met study criteria (median age = 32 years, IQR = 24-40 years) with a total of 701 ED visits. Eighty-six interviews were conducted. Most patients (71.6%) had between one and three visits to the ED during the study period. However, after removing Site 3 from the analysis because of the short data enrollment period (3.5 months), which influenced the mean number of visits for the entire cohort, 52% of patients had between one and three ED visits over 10 months, 21% had four to nine visits, and 27% had between 10 and 67 visits. Fifty-nine percent of patients were discharged home. The median time to initial analgesic for the cohort was 74 minutes (IQR = 48-135 minutes). Differences between choice of analgesic agent and route selected were evident between sites. For the cohort, 680 initial analgesic doses were given (morphine sulfate, 42%; hydromorphone, 46%; meperidine, 4%; morphine sulfate and ibuprofen or ketorolac, 7%) using the following routes: oral (2%), intravenous (67%), subcutaneous (3%), and intramuscular (28%). Patients reported a significantly lower targeted discharge pain score (mean +/- SD = 4.19 +/- 1.18) compared to the actual documented discharge pain score within 45 minutes of discharge (mean +/- SD = 5.77 +/- 2.45; mean difference = 1.58, 95% confidence interval = .723 to 2.44, n = 43).

CONCLUSIONS

While half of the patients had one to three ED visits during the study period, many patients had more frequent visits. Delays to receiving an initial analgesic were common, and post-ED interviews reveal that sickle cell pain patients are discharged from the ED with higher pain scores than what they perceive as desirable.

摘要

目的

报告参与急诊(ED)镰状细胞学习协作的每个站点的基线(在质量改进干预之前)患者和就诊特征以及镇痛管理实践。

方法

在中西部三个 ED 中进行了一项前瞻性、多站点纵向队列研究,在学习合作模式下进行。每个站点都组建了一个多学科团队,负责改善镰状细胞疾病(SCD)患者的镇痛管理。每个团队都为 SCD 患者制定了护士启动的镇痛方案(在一个站点实施了 3.5 个月的基线数据收集期后,在另外两个站点实施了 10 个月)。所有站点均前瞻性纳入急性疼痛危机和 SCD 的成人患者。回顾了符合研究标准的所有患者的病历。提取了人口统计学、卫生服务和镇痛管理数据,包括 ED 就诊频率数据、ED 处置、到达和出院疼痛评分,以及初始镇痛药物的名称和途径。每个站点每季度在出院后 14 天内对 10 名患者进行 10 次访谈,询问患者出院时可接受的最高疼痛水平。主要结局变量是初始镇痛药物的使用时间。变量数据以平均值和标准差(SD)或中位数和四分位距(IQR)表示,非正态数据以中位数和四分位距表示。

结果

共有 155 名符合研究标准的患者(中位年龄=32 岁,IQR=24-40 岁),共进行了 701 次 ED 就诊。共进行了 86 次访谈。大多数患者(71.6%)在研究期间有 1-3 次 ED 就诊。然而,由于第 3 个站点的数据入组时间较短(3.5 个月),这影响了整个队列的平均就诊次数,因此从分析中删除了第 3 个站点后,52%的患者在 10 个月内有 1-3 次 ED 就诊,21%的患者有 4-9 次就诊,27%的患者有 10-67 次就诊。59%的患者出院回家。队列的中位初始镇痛时间为 74 分钟(IQR=48-135 分钟)。不同站点之间明显存在镇痛药物选择和途径选择的差异。对于该队列,共给予 680 剂初始镇痛药物(硫酸吗啡,42%;氢吗啡酮,46%;哌替啶,4%;硫酸吗啡和布洛芬或酮咯酸,7%),使用以下途径:口服(2%)、静脉内(67%)、皮下(3%)和肌肉内(28%)。患者报告的出院时目标疼痛评分(均值+/-SD=4.19+/-1.18)明显低于出院后 45 分钟内实际记录的出院疼痛评分(均值+/-SD=5.77+/-2.45;均值差异=1.58,95%置信区间=0.723 至 2.44,n=43)。

结论

尽管有一半的患者在研究期间有 1-3 次 ED 就诊,但许多患者就诊次数更频繁。接受初始镇痛的延迟很常见,ED 后访谈显示镰状细胞疼痛患者从 ED 出院时的疼痛评分高于他们认为理想的疼痛评分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验