• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人急诊患者镰状细胞疼痛危象:改善镇痛管理的学习协作模式。

Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: a learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, the Institute for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00693.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00693.x
PMID:20370779
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to report the baseline (prior to quality improvement interventions) patient and visit characteristics and analgesic management practices for each site participating in an emergency department (ED) sickle cell learning collaborative.

METHODS

A prospective, multisite longitudinal cohort study in the context of a learning-collaborative model was performed in three midwestern EDs. Each site formed a multidisciplinary team charged with improving analgesic management for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Each team developed a nurse-initiated analgesic protocol for SCD patients (implemented after a baseline data collection period of 3.5 months at one site and 10 months at the other two sites). All sites prospectively enrolled adults with an acute pain crisis and SCD. All medical records for patients meeting study criteria were reviewed. Demographic, health services, and analgesic management data were abstracted, including ED visit frequency data, ED disposition, arrival and discharge pain score, and name and route of initial analgesic administered. Ten interviews per quarter per site were conducted with patients within 14 days of their ED discharge, and subjects were queried about the highest level of pain acceptable at discharge. The primary outcome variable was the time to initial analgesic administration. Variable data were described as means and standard deviations (SDs) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for nonnormal data.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients met study criteria (median age = 32 years, IQR = 24-40 years) with a total of 701 ED visits. Eighty-six interviews were conducted. Most patients (71.6%) had between one and three visits to the ED during the study period. However, after removing Site 3 from the analysis because of the short data enrollment period (3.5 months), which influenced the mean number of visits for the entire cohort, 52% of patients had between one and three ED visits over 10 months, 21% had four to nine visits, and 27% had between 10 and 67 visits. Fifty-nine percent of patients were discharged home. The median time to initial analgesic for the cohort was 74 minutes (IQR = 48-135 minutes). Differences between choice of analgesic agent and route selected were evident between sites. For the cohort, 680 initial analgesic doses were given (morphine sulfate, 42%; hydromorphone, 46%; meperidine, 4%; morphine sulfate and ibuprofen or ketorolac, 7%) using the following routes: oral (2%), intravenous (67%), subcutaneous (3%), and intramuscular (28%). Patients reported a significantly lower targeted discharge pain score (mean +/- SD = 4.19 +/- 1.18) compared to the actual documented discharge pain score within 45 minutes of discharge (mean +/- SD = 5.77 +/- 2.45; mean difference = 1.58, 95% confidence interval = .723 to 2.44, n = 43).

CONCLUSIONS

While half of the patients had one to three ED visits during the study period, many patients had more frequent visits. Delays to receiving an initial analgesic were common, and post-ED interviews reveal that sickle cell pain patients are discharged from the ED with higher pain scores than what they perceive as desirable.

摘要

目的

报告参与急诊(ED)镰状细胞学习协作的每个站点的基线(在质量改进干预之前)患者和就诊特征以及镇痛管理实践。

方法

在中西部三个 ED 中进行了一项前瞻性、多站点纵向队列研究,在学习合作模式下进行。每个站点都组建了一个多学科团队,负责改善镰状细胞疾病(SCD)患者的镇痛管理。每个团队都为 SCD 患者制定了护士启动的镇痛方案(在一个站点实施了 3.5 个月的基线数据收集期后,在另外两个站点实施了 10 个月)。所有站点均前瞻性纳入急性疼痛危机和 SCD 的成人患者。回顾了符合研究标准的所有患者的病历。提取了人口统计学、卫生服务和镇痛管理数据,包括 ED 就诊频率数据、ED 处置、到达和出院疼痛评分,以及初始镇痛药物的名称和途径。每个站点每季度在出院后 14 天内对 10 名患者进行 10 次访谈,询问患者出院时可接受的最高疼痛水平。主要结局变量是初始镇痛药物的使用时间。变量数据以平均值和标准差(SD)或中位数和四分位距(IQR)表示,非正态数据以中位数和四分位距表示。

结果

共有 155 名符合研究标准的患者(中位年龄=32 岁,IQR=24-40 岁),共进行了 701 次 ED 就诊。共进行了 86 次访谈。大多数患者(71.6%)在研究期间有 1-3 次 ED 就诊。然而,由于第 3 个站点的数据入组时间较短(3.5 个月),这影响了整个队列的平均就诊次数,因此从分析中删除了第 3 个站点后,52%的患者在 10 个月内有 1-3 次 ED 就诊,21%的患者有 4-9 次就诊,27%的患者有 10-67 次就诊。59%的患者出院回家。队列的中位初始镇痛时间为 74 分钟(IQR=48-135 分钟)。不同站点之间明显存在镇痛药物选择和途径选择的差异。对于该队列,共给予 680 剂初始镇痛药物(硫酸吗啡,42%;氢吗啡酮,46%;哌替啶,4%;硫酸吗啡和布洛芬或酮咯酸,7%),使用以下途径:口服(2%)、静脉内(67%)、皮下(3%)和肌肉内(28%)。患者报告的出院时目标疼痛评分(均值+/-SD=4.19+/-1.18)明显低于出院后 45 分钟内实际记录的出院疼痛评分(均值+/-SD=5.77+/-2.45;均值差异=1.58,95%置信区间=0.723 至 2.44,n=43)。

结论

尽管有一半的患者在研究期间有 1-3 次 ED 就诊,但许多患者就诊次数更频繁。接受初始镇痛的延迟很常见,ED 后访谈显示镰状细胞疼痛患者从 ED 出院时的疼痛评分高于他们认为理想的疼痛评分。

相似文献

1
Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: a learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management.成人急诊患者镰状细胞疼痛危象:改善镇痛管理的学习协作模式。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00693.x.
2
Emergency department management of acute pain episodes in sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病急性疼痛发作的急诊科管理
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 May;14(5):419-25. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.033. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
3
Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: results from a quality improvement learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management.成人急诊科镰状细胞疼痛危象患者:一项质量改进学习合作模式的结果,旨在改善镇痛管理。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):430-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01330.x.
4
Outcomes after intravenous opioids in emergency patients: a prospective cohort analysis.急诊患者静脉注射阿片类药物后的结局:一项前瞻性队列分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):477-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00405.x. Epub 2009 May 7.
5
Impact of an emergency department pain management protocol on the pattern of visits by patients with sickle cell disease.急诊科疼痛管理方案对镰状细胞病患者就诊模式的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;32(3):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.07.022. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
6
Emergency department crowding and analgesic delay in pediatric sickle cell pain crises.儿科镰状细胞疼痛危象中的急诊科拥挤与镇痛延迟
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Oct;27(10):911-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182302871.
7
The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration.分诊系统和分诊分数对急诊科镇痛药物给药及时性的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):867-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020.
8
Efficacy and safety profile of a single dose of hydromorphone compared with morphine in older adults with acute, severe pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.单剂量氢吗啡酮与吗啡用于急性重度疼痛老年患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.02.002.
9
Oral versus intravenous opioid dosing for the initial treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department.急诊科急性肌肉骨骼疼痛初始治疗中口服与静脉注射阿片类药物给药的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00266.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
10
The recidivism characteristics of an emergency department observation unit.急诊科观察单元的累犯特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of healthcare utilization among patients with sickle cell disease hospitalized with pain crises.因疼痛危象住院的镰状细胞病患者的医疗保健利用模式。
EJHaem. 2020 Nov;1(2):438-447. doi: 10.1002/jha2.84. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Communicating and understanding pain: Limitations of pain scales for patients with sickle cell disorder and other painful conditions.沟通和理解疼痛:镰状细胞病和其他疼痛病症患者的疼痛量表的局限性。
J Health Psychol. 2022 Jan;27(1):103-118. doi: 10.1177/1359105320944987. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
3
Indication-Specific Opioid Prescribing for US Patients With Medicaid or Private Insurance, 2017.
2017 年美国有医疗补助或私人保险的患者的阿片类药物特定适应证处方
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4514.
4
Sickle-Cell Disease Co-Management, Health Care Utilization, and Hydroxyurea Use.镰状细胞病的共同管理、医疗保健利用和羟基脲的使用。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Jan-Feb;33(1):91-105. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190143.
5
Evaluation of a Non-Parenteral Opioid Analgesia Protocol for Acute Sickle Cell Pain Episodes in Children.儿童急性镰状细胞疼痛发作的非胃肠外阿片类镇痛方案评估
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 18;8(10):1728. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101728.
6
Optimizing the care model for an uncomplicated acute pain episode in sickle cell disease.优化镰状细胞病单纯急性疼痛发作的护理模式。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):525-533. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.525.
7
Improving Emergency Department-Based Care of Sickle Cell Pain.改善以急诊科为基础的镰状细胞疼痛护理。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):412-417. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.412.
8
A randomized controlled trial comparing two vaso-occlusive episode (VOE) protocols in sickle cell disease (SCD).一项比较两种镰状细胞病(SCD)血管阻塞性发作(VOE)方案的随机对照试验。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Feb;93(2):159-168. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24948. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
9
Saudi SCD patients' symptoms and quality of life relative to the number of ED visits.沙特阿拉伯镰状细胞病患者的症状及生活质量与急诊就诊次数的关系。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 20;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0096-z.
10
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Emergency Department Care for Pediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.一项旨在改善急诊科对镰状细胞病儿科患者护理的质量改进计划。
J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2014 Feb;21(2):62-70.