• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖化血红蛋白在诊断 2 型糖尿病中的应用:一项基于社区的研究。

Utility of glycated hemoglobin in diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a community-based study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;95(6):2832-5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2433. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1210/jc.2009-2433
PMID:20371663
Abstract

CONTEXT

Although glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has recently been incorporated as a diagnostic test by the American Diabetes Association, its validity needs to be established in Asian Indians in a community setting.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess the validity of HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test in individuals with newly detected diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Community based randomized cross sectional study in urban Chandigarh, a city in north India, from April 2008 to August 2009.

SUBJECTS

Subjects included 1972 subjects aged 20 yr or older.

INTERVENTION

Intervention included an oral glucose tolerance test and glycated hemoglobin in all the subjects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Utility of HbA1c as a diagnostic method in newly detected diabetes mellitus subjects was evaluated.

RESULTS

Using World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, 134 (6.7%) had newly detected diabetes mellitus, 192 (9.7%) known diabetes mellitus, 329 (16.6%) prediabetes, and 1317 (69.4%) were normal of 1972 people screened. Using only the ADA criteria, 38% people were underdiagnosed. An HbA1c level of 6.1% had an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% for diagnosing diabetes. A HbA1c level of 6.5% (+/-2 SD) and 7% (+/-2.7 SD) had sensitivity and specificity of 65 and 88% and 42 and 92%, respectively, with corresponding positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 75.2 and 96.5% and 90.4 and 94.4%, respectively, for diagnosis of newly detected diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

A HbA1c cut point of 6.1% has an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% and can be used as a screening test, and a cut point of 6.5% has optimal specificity of 88% for diagnosis of diabetes.

摘要

背景

尽管糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)最近已被美国糖尿病协会纳入诊断测试,但在社区环境中的亚洲印第安人群体中,其有效性仍需确定。

目的

本研究旨在评估 HbA1c 作为新诊断糖尿病患者筛查和诊断测试的有效性。

设计和设置

2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 8 月,在印度北部城市昌迪加尔进行的基于社区的随机横断面研究。

受试者

受试者包括 1972 名年龄在 20 岁或以上的人。

干预

所有受试者均接受口服葡萄糖耐量试验和糖化血红蛋白检查。

主要观察指标

评估 HbA1c 作为新诊断糖尿病患者诊断方法的效用。

结果

根据世界卫生组织糖尿病诊断标准,134 人(6.7%)患有新诊断的糖尿病,192 人(9.7%)患有已知的糖尿病,329 人(16.6%)患有糖尿病前期,1317 人(69.4%)为正常。仅使用 ADA 标准,38%的人被漏诊。HbA1c 水平为 6.1%时,诊断糖尿病的敏感性和特异性最佳,分别为 81%。HbA1c 水平为 6.5%(+/-2 SD)和 7%(+/-2.7 SD)时,敏感性和特异性分别为 65%和 88%,42%和 92%,相应的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 75.2%和 96.5%,90.4%和 94.4%。

结论

HbA1c 切点为 6.1%时,敏感性和特异性最佳,分别为 81%,可作为筛查试验;切点为 6.5%时,特异性最佳,为 88%,可用于诊断糖尿病。

相似文献

1
Utility of glycated hemoglobin in diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a community-based study.糖化血红蛋白在诊断 2 型糖尿病中的应用:一项基于社区的研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;95(6):2832-5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2433. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
2
Diagnostic efficiency of hemoglobin A1c for newly diagnosed diabetes and prediabetes in community-based Chinese adults aged 40 years or older.血红蛋白A1c对40岁及以上中国社区成年人群新诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期的诊断效能
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Dec;16(12):853-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0157. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
3
HbA1c Cutoff Point of 5.9% Better Identifies High Risk of Progression to Diabetes among Chinese Adults: Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study.HbA1c 截断值为 5.9% 可更好地识别中国成年人发生糖尿病进展的高危风险:一项回顾性队列研究的结果。
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Jun 13;2018:7486493. doi: 10.1155/2018/7486493. eCollection 2018.
4
Hemoglobin A1c and glucose criteria identify different subjects as having type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and older populations: the KORA S4/F4 Study.糖化血红蛋白和血糖标准在中年和老年人中识别出不同的 2 型糖尿病患者:KORA S4/F4 研究。
Ann Med. 2012 Mar;44(2):170-7. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.531759. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
5
Impact of mismatches in HbA vs glucose values on the diagnostic classification of diabetes and prediabetes.糖化血红蛋白值与血糖值不匹配对糖尿病和糖尿病前期诊断分类的影响。
Diabet Med. 2020 Apr;37(4):689-696. doi: 10.1111/dme.14181. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
6
Evaluation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for diagnosing type 2 diabetes and prediabetes among Palestinian Arab population.在巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人群中评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)用于诊断2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e88123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088123. eCollection 2014.
7
Optimal Glycated Hemoglobin Cutoff Point for Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in Iranian Adults.伊朗成年人诊断 2 型糖尿病的最佳糖化血红蛋白切点。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Dec;42(6):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Discrepancies between Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Fasting Plasma Glucose for Diagnosing Impaired Fasting Glucose and Diabetes Mellitus in Korean Youth and Young Adults.糖化血红蛋白与空腹血浆葡萄糖在诊断韩国青年和成年人空腹血糖受损及糖尿病中的差异。
Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Apr;43(2):174-182. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0046. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
9
Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study.评估ADA糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)标准在诊断中国糖尿病高危青少年及青年人群的糖尿病前期和糖尿病中的应用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 8;8(8):e020665. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020665.
10
HbA1c and the diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes in a middle-aged and elderly Han population from northwest China (HbA1c).在中国西北地区的中年和老年汉族人群中,HbA1c 与糖尿病和糖尿病前期的诊断(HbA1c)。
J Diabetes. 2013 Sep;5(3):282-90. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12035. Epub 2013 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based type 2 diabetes screening programmes designed for priority populations: a scoping review protocol.针对重点人群设计的基于社区的2型糖尿病筛查项目:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 23;15(6):e090787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090787.
2
Brazilian guideline for screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a position statement from the Brazilian Diabetes Society.巴西2型糖尿病筛查与诊断指南:巴西糖尿病协会的立场声明
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Mar 4;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01572-w.
3
Diagnostic cut-off value of haemoglobin A1c for diabetes mellitus in Harare, Zimbabwe.
津巴布韦哈拉雷地区糖尿病患者血红蛋白A1c的诊断临界值
Afr J Lab Med. 2024 Apr 23;13(1):2373. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2373. eCollection 2024.
4
Identification of Plausible Candidates in Prostate Cancer Using Integrated Machine Learning Approaches.使用集成机器学习方法识别前列腺癌中可能的候选者。
Curr Genomics. 2023 Dec 20;24(5):287-306. doi: 10.2174/0113892029240239231109082805.
5
The clinical value of glycosylated hemoglobin level in newly diagnosed ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes.新诊断酮症倾向 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的临床价值。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 10;14:1244008. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1244008. eCollection 2023.
6
Incidence and predictors of metabolic syndrome in Asian-Indians: a 10-year population-based prospective cohort study.亚洲印度人的代谢综合征发病率及预测因素:一项基于人群的10年前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2023 Feb 7:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s13410-023-01169-5.
7
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S19-S40. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S002.
8
Novel oxadiazole derivatives as potent inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes: Synthesis, evaluation, and molecular docking studies.新型恶二唑衍生物作为α-淀粉酶和α-葡萄糖苷酶的强效抑制剂:合成、评价及分子对接研究
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2021 Dec;24(12):1632-1642. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2021.58429.12977.
9
The Compatibility of Hemoglobin A1c with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Fasting Plasma Glucose.糖化血红蛋白A1c与口服葡萄糖耐量试验及空腹血糖的相关性
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020 Aug 24;54(3):351-356. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.97992. eCollection 2020.
10
Prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus using fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels among individuals with impaired fasting plasma glucose: a cross-sectional study in Thailand.空腹血糖受损个体中使用空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白水平预测2型糖尿病:泰国的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 10;10(11):e041269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041269.