Suppr超能文献

消化性溃疡出血患者内镜止血后使用质子泵抑制剂的情况。

Proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

作者信息

Mesihovic Rusmir, Vanis Nenad, Mehmedovic Amila, Gornjakovic Srdjan, Gribajcevic Mehmed

机构信息

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Med Arh. 2009;63(6):323-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common and potentially fatal condition. For patients with bleeding peptic ulcers that display major endoscopic stigmata of recent hemorrhage, a combination of endoscopic and pharmacologic therapy is the current standard management.

OBJECTIVE

To show our experience with management of peptic ulcer bleeding.

PATIENTS

Patients who presented with gastrointestinal bleeding caused by peptic ulcer or recent history (< 24 h before presentation) of hematemesis and/or melena admitted to our hospital emergency departments, and patients whose ulcer hemorrhage started after hospitalization for an unrelated medical or surgical condition.

METHODS

Patients with actively bleeding ulcers and those with nonbleeding visible vessel or adherent clot were treated with epinephrine injection and/or endoscopic hemoclips, and randomized to receive intravenous pantoprasole according to the continuous regimen (dose of 5 x 40 mg in continuous infusion of 8 mg/h for 72 h) or the standard regimen (40 mg bolus of PPI twice daily for 3 days). After the infusion, all patients were given 40 mg PPI twice daily orally. The primary end point was the in-hospital rebleeding rate, as discovered by the repeated endoscopy.

RESULTS

Bleeding recurred in 5 of 34 patients (14.7%) receiving the intensive regimen, and in 8 of 35 (22.8%) patients receiving the standard regimen. Hemoglobin (g/l) rate in standard regimen group was 93.5 +/- 23.8, and in intensive regimen group 106.6 +/- 22.4 (P = 0.042). Mean units of blood transfused for all patients in group were 71.8 +/- 45.8 in the intensive and 45.3 +/- 50.2 in the standard regimen group (P = 0.0257). The duration of hospital stay was 6.4 +/- 2.8 in standard group and 5.8 +/- 2.8 in the intensive group (P = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers with successful endoscopic hemostasis the standard PPI regimen had advantage on transfusion requirements, but no advantage with respect to in-hospital rates of rebleeding rates, need for surgery, length of hospital stay, or death, which corresponds with recent studies.

摘要

背景

消化性溃疡出血是一种常见且可能致命的疾病。对于出现近期出血的主要内镜下征象的消化性溃疡出血患者,内镜治疗与药物治疗相结合是当前的标准治疗方法。

目的

展示我们在消化性溃疡出血治疗方面的经验。

患者

因消化性溃疡导致胃肠道出血或在入院前有呕血和/或黑便近期病史(<24小时)而入住我院急诊科的患者,以及因无关的内科或外科疾病住院后发生溃疡出血的患者。

方法

对活动性出血溃疡患者以及有非出血性可见血管或附着血凝块的患者进行肾上腺素注射和/或内镜下止血夹治疗,并根据持续给药方案(以8毫克/小时的速度持续输注5×40毫克,共72小时)或标准给药方案(质子泵抑制剂40毫克静脉推注,每日两次,共3天)随机接受静脉注射泮托拉唑治疗。输注结束后,所有患者均口服40毫克质子泵抑制剂,每日两次。主要终点是通过重复内镜检查发现的院内再出血率。

结果

接受强化给药方案的34例患者中有5例(14.7%)出现再出血,接受标准给药方案的35例患者中有8例(22.8%)出现再出血。标准给药方案组的血红蛋白(克/升)率为93.5±23.8,强化给药方案组为106.6±22.4(P = 0.042)。强化给药方案组所有患者的平均输血量为71.8±45.8单位,标准给药方案组为45.3±50.2单位(P = 0.0257)。标准组的住院时间为6.4±2.8天,强化组为5.8±2.8天(P = 0.40)。

结论

在内镜止血成功的消化性溃疡出血患者中,标准质子泵抑制剂给药方案在输血需求方面具有优势,但在院内再出血率、手术需求、住院时间或死亡率方面没有优势,这与近期的研究结果一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验