Suppr超能文献

大孔与小孔网片在开放式切口疝修补术中 3 年随访结果相当。

Comparable results with 3-year follow-up for large-pore versus small-pore meshes in open incisional hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Hospital Medical School, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Surgery. 2010 Nov;148(5):969-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decreasing the amount of polypropylene by increasing pore size produces a lighter weight mesh that may improve tissue ingrowth and, functional properties of the abdominal wall and diminish mesh-related complications. It was the aim of this prospective observational cohort study to analyze the outcome of incisional hernia repair using small-pore versus large-pore meshes and using a standardized, open, retromuscular surgical technique.

METHODS

Across a 6-year period we analyzed 205 patients treated with a heavyweight mesh (group I) and 235 patients treated with a large-pore mesh (group II) for incisional hernias. Patients with a body mass index greater than 40 kg/m(2) and patients with hernias with a transverse diameter of more than 10 cm were not treated by a retromuscular mesh repair and are not included in this analysis. Recurrent incisional hernias also were not included. Both groups had 3 years of follow-up. Patients were evaluated for pain, discomfort, feeling of foreign material, and recurrences.

RESULTS

Pre-operative characteristics were comparable between the groups, including body mass index, diabetes, and smoking. The mean total hernia surface was 56 cm(2) for group I versus 48 cm(2) in group II. The mesh surface area was 448 cm(2) for group I and 425 cm(2) for group II. Considering pain scores, there was only a minor difference between the 2 groups at 1-month follow-up, at which time, the Visual Analogue Scale was 5.8 in group I and 4.9 in group II (P = .16). All other scores were comparable between the groups. In group I, 7 recurrences (3.4%) were recorded after 3 years, of which 6 were already apparent 1 year after initial repair. In group II, 9 recurrences (3.8%) were diagnosed, again 6 within the first year after repair.

CONCLUSION

Large-pore meshes can be used safely for open primary incisional hernia repair with an equal outcome compared with small-pore meshes in nonobese patients with defects smaller than 10 cm in width, in regard to both recurrence rates and chronic discomfort.

摘要

背景

通过增加孔径来减少聚丙烯的用量,可以生产出更轻的网片,这可能会改善组织的向内生长和腹壁的功能特性,并减少与网片相关的并发症。本前瞻性观察队列研究旨在分析使用小孔径与大孔径网片、采用标准化的开放式、后置肌肉的手术技术治疗切口疝的结果。

方法

在 6 年期间,我们分析了 205 例使用重网片(I 组)和 235 例使用大孔径网片(II 组)治疗切口疝的患者。身体质量指数大于 40 kg/m2 和疝的横径大于 10 cm 的患者未接受后置肌肉网片修复,因此未纳入本分析。复发性切口疝也不包括在内。两组均随访 3 年。对患者进行疼痛、不适、异物感和复发情况的评估。

结果

两组患者的术前特征相似,包括体重指数、糖尿病和吸烟情况。I 组的平均总疝表面积为 56 cm2,II 组为 48 cm2。I 组的网片表面积为 448 cm2,II 组为 425 cm2。考虑到疼痛评分,两组在 1 个月随访时仅有轻微差异,此时视觉模拟评分(VAS)I 组为 5.8,II 组为 4.9(P =.16)。两组间的其他评分均相似。I 组有 7 例(3.4%)复发,其中 6 例在初次修复后 1 年内已经出现。II 组诊断出 9 例(3.8%)复发,其中 6 例也在修复后 1 年内。

结论

对于宽度小于 10 cm 的非肥胖患者的初次切口疝,大孔径网片可安全用于开放式修复,与小孔径网片相比,在复发率和慢性不适方面具有相同的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验